Archives for the month of: May, 2017

Source: How To Find The Best Lawyer Against A Medical Malpractice?

Advertisements

i understand  BJP candidates simply give rs.5000 to women voters  and rs 4000 to man voters to vote BJP to get their nominees elected.. what grand party Modi talks about. why  Police anti corruption bureau in maharashtra not working for it seems it is also corrupted obviously

I would say don’t take cash from these BJP  or any other party scoundrels ; else you will be taken for granted by the municipal counsellors. my warning to you voters,

take care i am publishing here.

if election commission is  jealously  guarding election fundamentals, rush immediately in maharashtra at panvel constituencies if you really mean.

None will file FIRs.

suo motu EC can move is my suggestion, tks election commissioners.

 

 

 

fact is Prophet mohammed was a more considered man just because he realized life was brutish and short then – a lot of men died in war or otherwise, so too many widows were there – most needed life needs of food , shelter, roof, else they were exploited – so he said a man can marry only those widows not for sex purposes obviously but may use for sex when his normal wife is ill or otherwise disabled for any reason – that way he said only 3 more widows he needs to support – that his own resal first wife willingly agreed in token of Prophets endearance and his thought that way widows only three were widows he can take and support if he can support else Islamic society too following Monogamy, wherever the husbands cannot obviously support more widows , so according to his ability to support he can pick up upto 3 three more widows only – f he can support one widow yes he can take one widow and her children too, that is all – that great humanistic ideal is conveniently misused by Mullahs for their own convenience that way Mullahs became just a great menace to islamic society that hon court need to realise as nether Kapil sibal or any lawyer fighting for the board would bring out – in fact Prophet was a great humanistic thinker of that time that way he wrote Quran obviating Hadith and other illiteracy based ideas, so those many years these advocates quote is quoted irrationally. The court can say if one can afford to maintain up to three widows – widows only can pick up upto three widows as additional wives not contracting fresh virgin muslim girls that way their pleas can be rightly defeated. – obviously one needs to be financially sound to provide decent food . decent roof , decent shelter , else his taking additional widows in his house hold is obviously against very Koranic dispensations is my considered view.

 

Every living human being equal in all aspects cannot be denied one’s fundamental rights is the basic thought based on Natural justice, following is reported

India is having clear secular constitution – obviously , what Mahatma Gandhi said is in tune with Gautham Buddha, that there is No caste as such but just imaginary ideas – as all men(people) are equal mentally and physically , as none without physique and some intelligence cannot even stand up and walk when so why we should work on imaginary ideas – castes only reflected work only – if we work on caste as something different we obviously divide and rule the people is truth and fact that aspect need to be argued in talaq case or caste cases – none can prove ‘talaq as some justified behavior of one gender over the other in a most arbitrary way , so true in the case of castes(work based ideas are relevant ) if not caste works against just human beings obviously against UN Human Rights convention , India is a signatory just being a committed to the fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution of india – (true media men may not appreciate but judges of eminence only can, so media just report if not well qualified in constitutional interpretation of articles , after all constitutional Articles are articulating on well considered doctrines of constitutions developed from time immemorial; so fact is you cannot divide one section of people with the other; but that was not followed so we divided India and Pakistan, that division is creating so many issues right from Kashmir issues on every other aspect issues, today you have Comander. Kulbhushan Jadhav -(who was just abducted by Pakistan, not in action between India and Pakistan – so he needs Consular Access as the Pak Army  denied and conducted trial is indeed ‘questionable  conduct of the Army court’, as it ‘failed ‘ to grant his rights as any citizen gets under Natural justice , without providing that relief if sentenced to death is obnoxious – India and Pakistan are members of UN , so when any fails to provide natural justice to any accused, obviously ‘arbitrary ) before ICJ, why neither India nor Pakistan could solve since last about 70 years that problem will continue as each will argue on untenable ideas, before the ICJ but just referring to Vienna war convention, that convention articles obviously applicable in the case spy issues, as there is no such convention so far developed ; but simply quoting like Devils quoting scriptures, that kind of arguments can never succeed – you have some Nikam some advocate talking on conventions when he is just some criminal lawyer nothing more nothing less (without any Malice but on Convention ideas ); so, Nikam’s ideas too represent some Devil quoting scriptures only; like that – in talaq issues some Msulana’s ideas is worked on but it is purely on shariat of Islam as quoted in Quoran, so Moulana’s practice like some Devil quoting scriptures; similarly in so called ‘caste cases’ some British divide and rue kind of laws perpetrated by the British PM Mr Ramsay MacDonald, nd some clauses of of Govt of india Act 1919 r/w 1935 Act (not approved by india in the Round table conferences but today caste protagonists reiterate what British tried the ‘divide and rule ‘ mechanism so these caste advocates are equal to the so called Devils quoting some scriptures (Devils do misuse or just omit vital points – (like a cardiac surgeon forgot about heart function but operates the patient on heart like , such surgeon is called a ‘Devil’), obviously what we do today is to obtain some personal advantages like VP singh on till date political parties did obviously misread very Constitution of lndia, as Indian Attorneys General, so far, except ‘Soli Sorabji’, did or do function in a ‘partisan’, (supporting their political masters), in a manner unlike American Attorneys General of USA or like USSC judges though before the attorneys were in political parties so too many judges before becoming judges once they assume the office of Judges they are obviously independent of politics, that way American Independence is surviving even today ; but i doubt whether India will survive if politics rule the mind , sorry for indians,

The question arises today in Calcutta High Court Judge Mr Karnan, when he is suspended by the Supreme court of India recently for his recalcitrant activities.

He simply claimed SCI judges are corrupt without adducing evidence  in clear manner per Indian Evidence Act. Obviously, the judge  Mr, Karnan  exceeded his powers; he out to know, as a judge, when any one complains on corruption on any, he ought to file an FIR with a police station or he can file a private complaint before a judicial magistrate having jurisdiction – the minimum rule of law,

If he failed at the first procedure under Cr.P.C, obviously he failed under Art 14 of the constitution of India,

Obviously, ‘Audi Alteram Partem’ rule  under Natural justice he failed, obviously commits Contempt of Courts Act 1971; being a judge, he has no exception any where in the Cr.P.C nor in Evidence Act nor in the Constitution of India, when he ‘fails’ , obviously he fails on the procedure – procedure if fully followed it any complaint stands on four legs.

Obviously, being a judge who failed in following the procedure, cannot claim sec 16 of the Contempts of Court Act, which provides exceptions for a judge of Court of Record – that is the High Court – but having absolutely failed, he cannot  claim that ‘immunity’ of a judge of a Court of record – the High Court – is obvious.

when he condemns the procedure of the Cr.P. C. he fails to be a judge worth to be trusted – he is some one like any politician kind manipulator – so obviously he need to be discharges of judge duties of any Court of Record, when he is not even fit to be a just a criminal magistrate is obvious,.

Rightly, the hon SCI, suspended him as the Judge of the Calcutta High Court, when suspended , he automatically loses the privilege of a judge of any court let alone hon court of record.

If suspension is to be meaningful, ‘suspension’ withdraws all privileges be he anybody.

So, Karnan exceeded his powers arbitrarily is proved beyond doubt, by his own various actions;

If you allow him to be a judge he would cause innumerable harm to petitioners in the court , so obviously, on ‘Suspension’ he loses the powers of a judge absolutely;

Above all once suspended, and on trial at hon SCI before seven members bench, he issues NBW to all seven judges of constitutional court with temerity knowing no bounds on him – suspension can be like a ‘bramastra’ by higher up judiciary, the hon SCI,

Further, he avoids the the hon. SCI arrest warrant under execution on him – he runs here and there and now seeks hon SCI to recall the Arrest warrant as if he is more superior to very constitutional court of the SCI.

Therefore, hon SCI collegium needs to be careful in recommending appointments to courts of record, if wrongly done not understanding the mental perversion levels of people even if well educated, but obviously education perverted is never any great education, is my considered view.

See, this man ought to appear as an ordinary man, not even as an advocate much less as a judge, once suspended; but he still asserts, that shows, he has been over playing his so called ‘Dalit ‘ Card, not realizing, any body can be a ‘dalit’ why slone this man being of some caste/tribe he might be – there is no restriction for any other community man to be a ‘Dalit’ if he understands what is Buddhism – it never restricted any to be a Buddhist ; Buddhism never recognizes any caste or tribes or communities what Mahatma Gandhi said that there shall be no castes or communities (it includes tribes of all kinds);

Obviously , One needs to understand when Dr.B.R . Ambedkar christened  SC/ST ,obviously , he meant ‘No caste or Community’ of what  Buddha announced – when so Art 17 used in  the Atrocities Act 1989 or earlier never, ever, described any one of SC or ST but all people is to be perceived, if to allow Atrocities Act, so Karnan alone is not the beneficiary of that Act – even the SCI judges too , so he as karnan misuses the Atrocities Act only in his favor to be its beneficiary can be interpreted too.

That way he proves beyond doubt he tries play words – with his own low knowledge of laws is obvious, is my considered opinion.  (ends)