Issued in the public interest’

In March 2017

Public circulation

 

‘IMPORTANCE OF ‘WILL WRITING’

a Duty of every person;

Remember death can visit any , any time – No Doctor can save you –

 

Moment you think of leaving anything to any – Do write – Delay Not Please !

You may miss the boat!! –

An Advice unsolicited!!!

 

(circulating for all, any can decide, promptly)

By professor Dr. Guru Balakrishnan

BA., Ph.D., LL.B.,  LL.M(Constitution & Contracts)

Advocate(Original Side) Bombay High Court,

Cell: 9769699018 : LL.27740069 (Kharghar) E.mail: rapidanalysts@gmail.com

*******************************************************

Member , Bombay Bar Association, High court (OS), Mumbai

 

In my 45 years of Legal experience of writing ‘Wills’, ‘Codicils’ for a lot of people who wanted to leave to some of their properties – both – ‘Immovables and Movables’, to their ‘near and dear’;

 

I have to share my advice to one and all – whatever it is worth.

 

In my ‘Testamentary practice’, besides others, I have the honor to say a few following words to every one –

 

Testamentary jurisdiction is an ‘Administrative Jurisdiction’ of the  ‘charter’ High Courts (in Original Jurisdiction), as also District Civil courts in districts;

 

In Charter High courts (Charter is given by the Queen of England), still we have the following High Courts falling under such Jurisdiction:

 

Bombay High Court;

Calcutta  High Court;

Madras High Court;

Allahabad High Court.

 

IN other High courts that are ‘not falling’ under Charter Jurisdiction scheme -there wii be ‘No Original side’, in all other High Courts – so, that work is done by City Civil courts, as also in District cvil Courts, administered by the chief judges of the city civil courts and chief judges of the District courts  under their ‘administrative jurisdiction’ relevant;

 

In fact , when the ‘chiefs’ ‘administer’ the testamentary jurisdiction, the ‘Will’ do get ‘Probated’ in the  following manner, every where, in India:

 

 

  • The ‘Will’  before allowing to be executed, the following formalties the ‘Wills’ do undergo:

 

 

-The ‘Executor’ (trustedman ofthe Will owner) administers  the Will; that ‘Will’ have to be ‘published’ in the prominent English and vernacular dailies, as ‘a public Notice’ that the ‘Will’ (his desire to distribute his assets whatever remains in tact at the time of his death after meeting his obsequies) of the person on his or properties are under ‘probation’ (assessment by the jurisdictional courts, before the relevant court), and complete address of the courts be provided,  in the said  ‘public notice’, – signed by the Advocate concerned, granting  ‘three weeks’ Notice’ to the claimants, if any, for honorable court dispensation per law;

 

 

  • If there are ‘claimants’ for the properties to the ‘Will originator’, they need to ‘lodge their relevant claims’ before the honorable Court, saying – ‘how they are holding rights,on the said ‘Willed Properties’?;

 

 

 

  • If the Honorable Court admits the  relevant ‘claim(s)’ then such claims be read into the ‘Willed properties’, accordingly and be distributed, per court dispensation, by the very same Executor, appropriately modifing the terms of the ‘Will’;
  • If there are either ‘No claimants’ or ‘Claimants’ are there but ‘disallowed’ by the honorable Court, naturally, the ‘Will’ contents have to be duly be disbursed , ‘per se’ the ‘Will’ only, (by due modifications of the terms in the Will, by the very Executor, ‘per law’- under Art 51A of the Part IVA of the Constitution of India (oblications as fundamental duties).

 

 

 

  • In the case of ‘ancestral properties’, there cannot be any Will as such is possible, but has to follow per se ‘ Indian rule of laws’, depending upon religion, based Succession Acts relevant – both Central and State amendments ruling on the date of disbursal have to be taken into effect  and be followed;

 

 

 

  • None can write any kind of ‘Will ‘ on ‘Intestate’ or ‘ancestral’ properties;(if written it is ‘Void ab initio’: Will is ‘non  est’ (not in existence) at all.
  • Tenency properties have to follow Tenancy Laws prevalent on the date of disbursal, as the ‘Tenancy’ being ‘Personal’, cannot be ‘willed’, by any ‘Will’ to any one else other than the very owner of the tenament in question;

 

 

 

  • ‘Will’ has to read out to the person (in his or language clearly,lest misunderstood, a condition precedent), who needs ‘Will’ be written; and that person ought to affix his or her signature, before two or three ‘witnesses’,  obviously, not related, in any way, to the signatory (Deponent), preferably;
  • Any one attempted to kill or do away the Will owner, cannot get his or her share from the very Will. even if the deponent testator ‘willed’ some property, to such a person – ‘beneficiary-felon’.

 

In fact , ‘Will writing lawyers’ being very small in number sometimes charge huge  or very huge ‘fees’ for writing the ‘Will’, that need not be paid, if the Bar council  has not allowed such huge fee, in fact every Bar council determines  and declares fees by a public circular, (if in doubt, please get in touch with the secretary of the Bar council of the relevant state in question ;

 

if you wish to pay ‘higher fees’ in volition, without complaints, then, you can  pay, there is No Bar as such, please.

 

In such cases, better avoid using such person’s services, after all, ‘Will writing service is a public Social Service to humans

 

If any lawyer, (Advocate) can take fees as per Bar council approved lists only, then you can use ‘such advocates’, without fear or favor;

 

I was usually ‘paid’ in volition, in the last several decades  for ‘writing’ Wills, a sum of Rs.1000.-(rupees One thousand only) (now it can be more, say, three times or so, of that amount, for information only pls. ).

 

This is issued for the benefit of the ‘Will’ proposers

 

sd/- Guru Balakrishnan

      Advocate(OS) -BHC

I can recall the exact date that I saw my most memorable president: October 5, 1960. My mother had loaded me and my two older brothers into our ’56 Chevy for a short ride into downtown Louisville, Kentucky. Arriving early for a political rally, she placed us directly in front of the podium for a…

via What America’s Most Remarkable Presidents Had In Common — Fortune

What  ‘ Reasoning’ is the major question before one?

 

Every ‘Reasoning’ has two sides like the same ‘coin’ -but misused by politicians in power,  is the sole bane – would politicians accept?

 

‘Democracy is a greatly ‘misused (Ought not be misused) tool in the hands of politicans ’obviously.

 

So Alexander Pope said Politics is the last resort of ‘scoundrels’ (politicians by and large fall in this category), not without sound Reasoning!

 

That only degenerates the very democratic fundamentals of secular robust constitutions in the world.

 

Professor Dr.G.Balakrishnan, Ph.D, LL.B., LL.M

Advocate of Bombay High Court (OS)

 

In a Secular  Democratic Republic of India, how come we have to bow to so called ‘customs and cultures’ of multu cultural country, as Secularism is thebasic tenet of the Indian Constitution – some concessions under Art 25 if granted cannot be misused by every religion or every community, every custom and culture; if bowed India cannot be a modern Democracy in its right meaning as such;

 

[(Even, the USA, there are too many denominations among christians,one such denomination is ‘ Evangellism Christians’, in that order falls president Mr Trump, his denomination also subscribes to ‘refugees’ are some kind of ‘suppliants’; they ought to be helped and protected under all costs, as Hindu dharmic law is, when so, how Mr Trump pass some blessed ‘Executive Order’ under ‘Travel Ban’ as such (obviously some jittery reaction it appears, the President cannot take is the norm); that way immediate fmr. President Mr Obama now like fmr. Mr. president Roosevelt raised his objections of President Tuft, then; so it is obvious fmr presidents would rise against any unruly dispensations of incumbent president in the USA, why so? That is called  the ‘advanced thinking process’  of any advanced country, that way honorable  USSC interprets the constitution in the presence of 25th amendment too.

 

Travel ban cannot achieve any real barring of ‘terrorists’ of any kind, for ‘terrorists’ wear new hats in which you can never locate them, they might use any route to reach  that way they did in 9/11 attacks in New York then, so every npw and then – so obviously, Trump idea of travel ban could achiieve very little to stop ‘terrorits’ ; they could  reach even very white house, though Trump’s own security men, as it happened in the case of personal body guardsOf smt Indira Gandhi, she was shot in point blank range; and she was assasinated; so also LTTE men entered in Sriperumpudur where they finished Rajiv Gandhi – though you can have any theories – te objective is achieved by ‘Terrorists’;

 

So, there is no safety valve as such, be it a president ofb

USA or anywhere – in the USA even Abraham Lincolnand then  JF Kennedy weren finished – that says, any kind of your enemy might get access to Terror-managers anywhere , one needs to know – There is Nothing called greatest security – even the Nuclear buttons to bein the hands of the US president might get triggered by any, even in the highest security situation, after all ‘artificial intelligence takes over, Terrorists are well versed in high end technologies, be it in ‘Artificial intelligence’, Robot-technology – how will you identify if some such is in cargo room of Air Force One?

 

Therefore, one needs to build good cordon by great friends for the President Mr Trump – I several times wonder how he would be safe, in his ‘Tongue lashing ‘techniques’; he is in the proximity of some terror attack on him – now terrorist target is just one man in Mr Trump, most easy target for the Terrorist, anywhere – No great dsecurity can protect Mr Trump he ought to know if he is indeed a ‘prudent person’.)]

  

When so, why, at all, the honorable Indian SC need work under so called outworn ‘judicial restriant’ concept in the cases like ‘culture and customs’; politicians should be constrained by due process of law, that is in the domain of Judiciary to examine under very Art 265 too, though that Art is applied for Taxation matters;

 

All said and done, India is a ’Secular ‘ democracy’ by every definition, ‘greatest security to any Nation’; as too many religions, too many customs and cultures cannot survive, so very easily, in the secular society, that way Secularism is the best of all ‘security system’ in the ‘security arsenal’ (civilized society) is obvious.

 

May  I ‘say’ on two DNA newspaper  articles/reports of 25th inst,  my view: (whether you like or not?) .

I have to say for ‘I am no politician’, just an ‘Advocate’ of Law under the Constitution;  

 

We have a  ‘boundened duty’ to cause of  ‘public awareness’ to preseve the Constitutional fundamentals;

 

that is the obvious  ‘salient  duty’,  for any  ‘Law officer’ of Court;

 

if one chooses to be an Advocate; he or she has to ‘pursue’ the ‘said road’ of ‘rule of law’ meticulously;

 

Else why do you want to be an Advocate, at all, think Mr Advocate?;

 

See –

 

Obviously Art 51A (duties of citizens, whether in public service or in politics is mandatory under article), Part IVA of the Constitution of India –

 

so the ‘President of India’ in his address on the eve of republic day on 25th Jan said,

 

– the ‘highest form of ‘FREEDOM carries with it greatest measure of discipline and humility‘’ ;

 

Read Plato’s Republic (Republica) = (res = entity; + publicus =public) Question is what do we mean by ‘Republic ?

 

The common understanding is ‘Republic is ruled not rpt not by the King but by ‘public‘ at large.

 

Thus, a State is generally governed by elected representatives, in ‘democracies’, in secular republics too, not repeat not by ‘hereditary  rulers or monarchs’, not by means of ‘Decree or Dogma , but now it is by ‘Rule of Law;

 

In about 200 ‘sovereign’ countries/States today about 150 states of the world over = about 3/4th have official names as ‘Republic’;

 

Many are indeed ruled by Despots/Dictators, a couple of them even by Elected Monarchs.

 

Pakistan in 1956 first adopted the term ‘Republic’,

 

Iran  too after revolution but address themselves as ‘Islamic Republic’;

 

In India, Indian Conxtitution os called as *Secular Democratic Republic

 

it was in India, a  ‘Dharma’ is supposed to rule;

 

with the king or with any such ‘Nomenclature’, even ‘elected rulers’, supposed to be ‘merely’ they are ‘just administrative’ funtionaries on behalf of Public, ‘once elected by people’ in universal election process (universal suffrage), they try to convince the people why their ‘Party’ ought to be given a chance to prove their mettle; that way secure votes from people (public).

 

Read Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates discusses ‘various forms’ of governments, like, Aristocracy, Timocracy (Military rule), Oligarchy(by the Rich and Wealthy), and finally ‘Democracy (people by themselves under ‘Self Rule’ like Athenian democracy (city-states);

 

in big populated countries, by some ‘Parliamentary representative’ method, [by new innovation by the people, as it is just impossible for every one to participate in governance themselves].  

 

In this type, entered the so called ‘party system’ that emerged into too many parties as today;

 

Man by nature is some ‘x’ type person (mostly idle type);

 

that allowed today ‘y’ type men(mostly ‘active type’) to form ‘Parties’ to govern’ (as it is said under Pareto Economics, only 20% do all the good work for the benefit of the 80% of people; that way most men are are just wasters of resources, so ‘economies’ suffer;  

 

In this process 20% men sometimes tend to misuse the trust people repose on them that way ‘corruption’ surfaced in a ‘theory of corruption’:

 

As long as 80% is some ‘x’ (idle) type men , ‘corruption’ will be persistent, under various forms;

 

so, it is said, by many great Economist thinkers;

 

‘you can never weed out corruption, from the face of the earth;

 

but ‘be happy to see corruption is not allowed to grow in demonic proportions’;

 

if you do that only that itself is simply great,;

 

it is further said; (after all you can’t deny a man who takes honey from ‘honey comb’ if he likes ‘to lick’ his ‘back of his own hand’!  

 

what we find now is some ‘Mobocracy’ every where has also entered in the absence of due control on the very men themselves;

 

(see in TN mobs wanted some ‘Jallikattu’, ‘promoted ‘by some political backing(with their personal reasons), as if supporting some ‘culture or art or some such’ ideas forced the state ‘to bow down’ to their obviously ‘illegal’ wishes and desires – like harming ‘Bulls’ or ‘Buffellows’ or  ‘cocks’ in cock-fights’ and the like .

 

 what else  do you  ‘call’ the nefarious activities when ‘read with’ so called cultures ‘tortures’ of animals – very domestic animals?:

 

Indian Constitution is indeed a great  thought of most civilized persons by a ‘Constituent Assembly’ in 1947 – how many accept is seen today ;

 

– obviously ‘No one wants to be ‘Self controlled’ persons today, ;

 

Mahatma Gandhi and a lot of founding fathers of the Indian Constitution were mentaly very highly matured, unlike today men – see in Bangalore, people enjoy a youth is killed by the accident, none rushed to his help but allowed him die, but had temerity to take pictures on their mobiles, that is the present ‘mental level of people’ in a so called city called ‘IT hub’!;

 

President’s address on the 25th ‘on the eve of republic day’ falling on the 26th january 2017;

 

he obviously rightly ‘bemoaned and rightly ‘high lighted’ and showed the importance of Art 51A (duties and obligations of any indian citizen) -’ citizen is described under Art 5 of the constitution of India; Indeed it is falling under, ‘ fundamental duties’ like ‘fundamental rights’ (after all  fundamental dutied preceed fundamental rights meaning ‘you need to sacrifice your ‘fundamental rights’ in respect of ‘fundamental duties’ that is such great importance of that Art 51A,falling under Part IVA (directive principles -constituent functions of the state);

 

(Part IV is also treated as a ‘part of fundamental rights’, of any citizen so he can demand from the very state), tht means Part IVA is equally important fundamental right of duty, you  can insist on any institution right from the Parliament on, no institution is ‘immune’ to this Art 51A is the sum and substance;  

 

in India we don’t have a separate  ‘State Citizenship’  as such ;

 

just ‘Domicile or Residency’ qualification cannot confer any kind of state citizenship as such;

 

and it cannot take away your ‘Citizenship’ conferred on you under Art 5 of the Constitution, if you are a Good Citizen’ ,

 

as ‘domicile rule’ is just ‘some  kind of administrative action’

 

in this light, i do not agree with CJI Mr Kehar singh that any indian state can follow any law of its own; obviously it  permits ‘mobocracy’ is my humble view;

 

in view of ‘failure of any uniformity all over india’, as Nation  India cannot be governed, if it allows all ‘fissiparous tendencies’;

 

hon CJI could have just dismissed the PILwithout merits’ and allow the PIL petitioner to approach the relevant Hon High Court ;

 

High Courts can try under its Judicial Review powers under  Art 226 r/w 227  that is very  much wider power than  that Art 32 of the Supreme court of India;

 

in the absence of so called perception ‘state citizenship right’, the parliament’s obvious failure to maintain ‘rule of law per se the constitutional basic tenets where ‘We never granted  to States’ to be any authority to allow any such strange laws;

 

as such after all all states were ‘created by 1956 reorganisation of states’ for administrative convenience only; wherein We ‘never’ allowed State republic as such;

 

so I suggest to the hon SC being the Apex court ‘need to reconsider its stance’;

 

Hon Ct shall not allow any ‘Mob rule ‘ in the Indian democratic set up is my considered view.

 

If allowed, only ‘shallows and miseries for the country is my further considered view;

 

you cannot control governance of a vast Nation under such ‘contradictions’;

 

if done it is like President Mr.  Trump Executive Order that debars all ‘Muslims’ cannot be allowed in the ‘USA’ as refugees, why even very American Muslim cannot go back to the USA – a crazy idea of Mr Trump;

 

that such an Order simply affected even ‘Green Card holders- Muslims‘ cannot re-enter;

 

if they went to ‘tour away anywhere’ cannot come back as they would be just ‘barred’  at all American Airports;

 

so the Federal Court judge suspends the presidential Executive order temporarily till all the Green Card-Muslims reenter USA;

 

Indeed Mr. Trump is issuing ‘all types of ‘contradictionary Executive Orders’, as he is absolutely  New to Presidential functions in the USA.

 

I am sure our CJI is not new to the office of CJI of the SC; ‘slips could be possible’, that can be corrected suo motu or by curative petitions by PIL petitioner here cited.

 

PIL man need to put  up PIL in the state concerned High Court which has extensive judicial review control under Art 226 compared to Art 32 and Art 32A which empowers the hon S C much less;

 

so I say, the very honorable SC could have dismissed ‘without analysing any merits of the the PIL’ and directing the PIL petitioner to move Madras High court;  

 

that could have been a ‘better way of handling judgements’, instead of sitting on some such judgements;

 

why do we have High courts?, if hon SC could decide all isues, like the one referred in the PIL, as the differenetr institutions are conferred some special powers, that ought to be honoured,  is my considered opinion;

 

Now, my considered view is that  the SC judgement on the PIL is ‘no ratio decidenti’ as such ;

 

so some ‘Obiter Dicta’ only (not falling under Art 141);

 

further it is no constitutional bench too;

 

it is just an Obiter type opinion of the honorable CJI, he might have declared due to ‘ too many pending  cases’ in the said Court;

 

Even the PIL holder ‘can seek curative’ from the hon SC division bench which I am sure hon court would consider again; and do the needful to restore the PIL to be tried at the relevant High court;

 

– here Madras High court is being the jurisdictional court, is again my considered opinion;

 

CJI of the honorable SC never bulldozes like the governments today;

 

TN did, PM Modi governmet did , in this problem of ‘Jallikattu’ beyond its powers if very carefully examined; Modi’s approach bordered to that of Mr Trump’s.

 

Never any problem can be ever settled overnight;

 

like some ‘flying meetings’ as if some ’fly by night operators’;

 

but by highly considered thought process that might take very long time too to decide;so judiciary delays judgements, that doesn’t mean ‘Jstice denied’ sir.

 

so ‘judgement Reserved’ idea surfaced;

 

In this PIL ‘Reserved’ also doesn’t arise at all;

Never judges work of judging issues are so very easy, like some Advocate or the politicians in government;

 

so Judges hold high ‘credibility’ in the public’s eye;

 

Like, politicians even some ‘Advocates’ of Law; who without preparation rush to conclusions;

 

 so people doubt any ‘Advocate;

Every aspect of law and the fact ought to have to be very patiently need to  be considered, assessed and analysed;

 

if you as ‘Advocate’ cannot do good work, better leave ‘Advocacy’ is the ‘sane counsel’ for such great advocates;

 

they are mushrooming as Bar councils failed rightly filtering them – whether one can be some meaningful ‘Advocate’ if not ? Better weed out;

 

if not, naturally Bar council might get very bad name;

 

Politicians in government work in ‘fits and starts’ manner as ‘law makers’;

 

so no ‘Statute’ is ‘sacrosanct’, why even ‘Constitutional Amendments’ too;

 

Obviously questioned in any Judicial Review, a very sacred work of the very honorable Constitutional courts;that happened in Kesavananda bharathy v st of Kerala; then in Coelho v st of TN in 2007

 

So need to be ‘tested in the reliable court of justice- – called the ’Constitutional Courts’ under Art 226 or Art. 32 under ‘Writs are for Judicial review’ (need not follow ji]udicial restraint as such if found something is very strange dispensation’;

 

obvious ‘prerogative writs’, are founded in Britain;

 

there is also Art 51A by smt Indira Gandhi ‘rightly  and sanely’ brought in in 1976, a great mature politician India got in her;

 

After the above  submission, i have to register my views of

 

‘Reasonings’ are as such , that the word:

 

‘Reasoning ‘ is ‘most misused’ word, – mostly mis-understanding of its ‘weights’;

 

 

May be as we are today some kind of ‘language chavinists’, – very dangerous doctrine we follow in a civilized society;

 

‘that makes us lose our standing/credibility’,

 

‘Ignorantia Legis est Non excusat’, in Latin terms, used in very ‘English’ based legal system;

 

India legal system is too England based perception that credibly ruled india for about 150 years and even today for the judgements are even today emulatable;

 

I find one TN lawyer just intimidates AWBI that it cannot file against the TN statute (obviously the lawyer crossed his brief can be also perceived; why he even might  be pulled  up, if he utters such statements in the court) , ‘as if he is some great ‘judge’ himself, that shows how his Advocacy standing today has degenerated, one can perceive.’

 

Advocate cannot talk like politicians;

 

if done ,they can be ‘censured’, by very Bar council or by the honorable bench concerned.

 

‘Any one can go against ‘any statute’, to be tested under the anvil of the constitution of India, is the fundamental right of any and every citizen, even by a very poor man, under forma pauperis procedure!

 

that much ‘common sense’ I expected from the TN lawyer appearing for the TN state –

 

‘No lawyer is a judge’;

 

but ‘some prop ‘for his client’ only, to lead his client ‘rightly’; if not he takes him  the client ‘for a ride’;

 

 Certainly Advocate is  ‘ Lawyer’ and is ‘No Judge’ at all;

 

he should keep his ‘mouth shut’ till when the matter is heard, that is called the principle of Natural justice;

 

not ‘Nature Justice’ he ought to know so too his followers, then only law improves, nations improve;

 

law is No Politics or Politicking;

 

passing an ‘Ordinance’ into  an Act means  ‘Big Nothing’;

 

or the very Ordinance is ‘not’ based upon ‘right’ procedural rules, laid down on the passing of Ordinances by the relevant Governors, in this case;

 

so obviously, we lost tract of that Maxim ‘Ignorantia Legis’  est non excusat’ , obviously forgot the principle;

 

that is why, ‘similar kinds ‘humans as lawyers’  – numbers are increasing day by day; a very bad day for justice; Justice never means it has to suport to mob hysteria.

‘Untold Problems’ are bound to arise;

 

you as  political representative of people cannot behave as you like or liked to interfere with high court jurisdiction on the relevant State’,

 

afterall ,you are circumscribed by Art 51A of Part IVA of the Constitution of India, under ‘duties’ ; every citizen is bound, as duties are more important  and significant, than your so called ill-understood ‘fundamental rights, like we do the Art 25; well discussed by Justice Mr Kuldip Sngh in Vallothan v Union of India in 1995;

 

No rights you can enjoy, without your ‘sacrosanct duty to the Nation’;

 

Nation never means chavinists in your community;

 

you better be away from them; if they fail in their duties per se Art 51A of the Constitution of India;

 

Honorable SC did  very very ‘Clearly pronounced’ in the case of ‘Indra shahani v UOI’ , it did not want to ‘interfere with’ state of  Kerala legislation on ‘creamy layer’ issue but it looked for central law for its action;

 

On 29th January Telengana Government appoints ‘Brahmins welfare board; as the very State realized ‘Brahmins’ are very ‘Unity in diversity of India, so cannot be neglected, so put under retired IAS officer Mr KV Ramana, as chair person

 

Would ‘all other States’ follow suit, a million $ question?

 

But remains to be seen – it falls under very Art 51A of Part IVA;

 

Brahmins are and were some kind of Brain Trust of India;

 

if any one recalls their contribution to the Nation, from Chakravarthi Rajagopalachariar, Last Governor General of India, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Prakasam Pantulu, Padit Madan Mohan Malavaiah, poet Subramanya Bharathi, PM – Mr PV Narasimha Rao (PM in most turbulent times for India, opened the Indian economy,  Narayanamurthy of Infosys opened the outsoursing business in IT sector, why Sir Mokshagundam Visveswaraiah who created and built the Metturdam to tame Cavery river waters lest wastage of water in sea is properly tamed and diverted for  irrigation and Agriculture to name a few .

 

Are we not proud of these great meaningful social workers, even Vinoabha Bhave founder of Bhommidan movement in Maharashtra, Bala Gangadhar Tilak, Gopala Krishna Gokhale, Rabindranath Tagore, and so on, why your present President Mr Pranabh Mukherjee,  retd Justice Krishnaiyer  (recently passed away) of the hon SC; and so many more names to roll out see what is Ms. J.Jayalalitha CM of TN (recently passed away); if they and their  ‘likes’ were if considered ‘as really friendly souls of India’, don’t we find patriotic Brahmins of India?

 

Even poet shri Annamaiah who opened the ‘doors’  most important of temples  for Harijan entry in Tirupathi Balaji and other temples; shri Chandrasekhara Saraswati after Srt Sankara and so many like Ramana Maharishi, now Sri Sri so many and so many who contributed, like Swami Vivekhananda, and his guru in Sarada Devi and ……; recently we lost Ms Jayalalitha as CM of TN who founded ‘Amma canteens’, and like things to alleviate the sufferings of TN ‘poor’ people and her death was vey badly mourned by TN people in millions across in TN and so  on. And so forth;

 

unfortunately   then ‘No keralite or any from Kerala  filed a Writ against ‘creamy layer issue’, (outcome of ‘Indrashahani  case,)  found itself into the ‘Kerala Act’; for declaring the said Act ‘ultra vires’ the Constitution of India in the Kerala High Court; that way creamy layer showed its ‘ugly head’ ‘on and of’;

 

you ought to know how to fight, like in ‘Chakravyuga’ taught in  Bharatha War fought by Arjuna, but we are ‘full of Abhimanyus’ today, since then , how will you fight, you need to think – ‘give work to your own thinking machine’;

 

that way our population are, why even our  ‘so called legal fraternity’ –Advocates today are expected to work untiringly like like Alladi Krishnaswami Iyer, or Nani Palkiwala, Soli Sorabji, there is no easy path for any!

 

If so, why politicians seek easy route? ‘ They want always easy money, easy everything…’

 

Ignorantia Legis’, est non excusat’ , ‘obviously forgotten’, then why similar kinds numbers are increasing day by day, even today in the name of so called National Schools of Law too, I feel ashamed to say. Are we happy to cheat ourselves?

 

See hon SC would just need to look at  Concurrent List’ based Acts only; and take action, as and when needed to rectify ‘scales of justice to preserve ‘rule of law’;

 

as Hon  Supreme Court shall  never would overstep and visit state laws, as already explained;

 

But in TN Governor’s Ordinance how obviously  ‘illegally resurrected’, since  the legal draft was vetted by union home ministry and duly forwarded for asscent by the president;

 

That situation (bad in law of procedure) might totter the very foundation of TN Governor’s Ordinance (if court visits without judicial restraint doctrine’ ) (ought to be to establish the doctrine of rule of law) (as normally Governor’s recommended Ordinance is always scrutinized by the office of President’s secretariat, once forwarded by the union Home ministry but here practically ‘reverse’);

 

this fact  is it might face  the  ‘heat’ from the hon SC, I believe;

 

Honorable  Supreme Court doesn’t take cognizance or note what PM said or not said, –  but it will just look at the ‘legality of the issue concerned’; (Nothing more and nothing less),  the central statutes and their veracity are always questioned;

 

as Animals protection and preservation Acts fall squarely under ‘concurrent lists’ where the central government only has the only ‘Say’ – one needs to carefully note not the State individually’; ( it cannot take refuge under so called ‘customs’ and ‘cultures’, culture and customs don’t hold water uner ‘secular’ democracy’ is very very obvious as secularism is the ‘basic tenet’ of the indian constitution.

‘Manu’ says that ‘Jallikattu as some ‘tradition based idea’, as  if, as old as  some 1000, or 4000 or 5000 years old ,(obviously he doesn’t know is a fact of ‘when ‘ correctly.)

 

Tell me sirs, which politician ‘so far agreed’: –  ‘he doesn’t know’, (every one knows);

 

just some of his great foolish or  fooling ideas, –obviously he (politician’ is ‘fooling the poor people’ since considered the mostly ignorant lot by Politicians, like PM did by his great ‘demonetization idea’;

 

Demonetzation objective was to see BJP opponents ‘don’t splurge’  cash in the elections slated from February to ensure BJP to win the five states; but he told the world just he is doing great job! Obviously fooled the poor people. Poor haced the heat; now consumer prices have shot up milk cost shot up by Rs.4/- per litre now – it is the people have to pay not the government is subsidizing with windfall gains of cash taken under the unaccounted sources of the people who hoarded cash!

 

Politicians always try to keep poor people always ‘ignorant’ for obvious reasons like our TN worked overtime on ‘Jallikattu’ to bury the ‘hatchet of irrigation and Agriculture Disaster’, besides poor ‘farmers suicides’;

 

TN politicians found ‘good excuse route’ to get out of agriculture damages, they played very very compared to so called ‘Jallikattu’, every TN man must know, if bestowed by sound  ‘common sense’.

 

Thinking of OPS and Sashikala is ‘as if’ they are like Lord Krishna did with Satyabhama on ‘Abhimanyu’s birth’;

Thus they conveniently ignored Agriculture disaster and suicides in favor of ‘Jallikattu’;

 

instead of pulling up the youth looking for ‘Jallikattu’-  ‘how do you expect’ – Agriculturist suffered in ‘crops-loss’; would you love the great ‘Jallikattu’?  and  would he like to prefer suicides?

 

I some times wonder!

 

,  Lord Krishna thought, if Abhimanyu’s father Arjun  knows how to come out of ‘Chakravyuga ‘ if not taught to Abhimanyu, Arjun would not have made Abhimanyu to face ‘Chakkravyuga’ then, obviously.

 

the Kaurava and Pandav countries would perish anyway,( do you think Arjuna would have liked such eventualities, Lord Krishna be it  ‘Krishna is divine or not’!) ;

 

 if Pandavas or Kauravas are ‘immortal’, as if ‘immortals’ have not to  perish; (even Aswathaama an immortal is told he is killed by very Yudhishtra  just to ensure Dronacharya to be fooled’ so wars are just carried on deceptions mostly is revealed then too;

 

see even Parikshit has to be got killed by as ‘Nagaraja’ (king of snakes’) in the form of snake’;

 

None is ever saved in the history is the realism;

 

We fought and won World War I and II ; after that, are we in command?

 

Think a while; that is the story of  ‘sands of time’;

Lord Krishna’s logic was OK in the case of the Kinds of ‘warrior’ classes;

 

if you are a warrior you also need to die, as none is allowed to stay on earth for ever;

 

if allowed there cannot be any more generations of people and animals and likes..;

 

everything has great logic;

 

the logic is you are needed to be there on earth as long as ‘you’re productive else ‘please leave’ is called ‘RIP’ principle.

 

but same logic is not OK for poor ‘domestic animals’ for they gave much more  than they are supposed to, so Lord was always kind of Cows or any productive animals;

 

but that is a kind of idea to take ‘wrong’ analogies is a kind  of  ‘deception strategy’ ;

 

that is why General Sun Yat Sen of China then called ‘All wars are deception’;

 

Politicians think here as if  their ‘some enemies’ are considered their own ‘very voters themselves’;

 

that way Sharad pawar simply ensured to lose food grains in rains and allowed rodents eataway in FCI godowns just ‘rot’ , recently, in the name that he doesn’t like the food grains price fall, a spurious claim by him;i

 

if he wanted to help agriculturists he could have given ‘subsidies’ to alleviate the problem not by simply wasting food grains – obviously he was negative thinker;

 

and in fact ‘in practice’ lost food grains is a great fact as his mind seems to have moved to mental ‘plateau’;

 

for that great man you give ‘Padma bhusahan’ how Modi government arrived  at such sad idea, i wonder.

 

In fact he is a ‘dead weight on earth’;

 

why you want that man’s great friendliness Mr Modi, – ‘may be Modi would have felt Shiva Sena would leave coalition with BJP’!

 

; obviously it seems , ‘these ‘awards’ are some kind of baits’ to get coalitions’;

 

if so what ‘Padma ViiBhushan’is worth? I wonder.

 

politicians do think very ‘voters’ are some ‘deadweight’, so they treat poor people practically as their ‘avowed enemies’ but treated like jallikattu animals is obvious;

 

the  politician chooses to ‘deliberately deceive’ his voters; – one way or the other;

 

like Sharad Pawar (filthily rich and wealthy as a builder and IPL promoter, (but mentally ‘big blank’);

 

in cricket games in BCCI , alleged to be well known in all kinds of ‘corrupt activities’,;

why he simply ‘spoiled’ a lot of food, and food grains, in food corporation (FCI) godowns in Panjab during UPA rule as ‘great’ food and agriculture minister);

 

(in fact he could not think some  better idea other than wasting foodgrains then);

 

obviously, he ill-treated the agriculturist poor in his own constituency is obvious ( now this man is conferred great ‘Padma Vibhushan’ by BJP government, for obvious reasons).

 

as if Modi thinks as if he  is  himself a great human like ‘Gandhiji’ so he replaced his photo in place of Gandhi in a calendar of KVIC; (every politician is some kind of a ‘scum’, if closely observed!)

 

[any politician himself deceives by his own ‘building castles’ in the air], any politician thinks he is some ‘Lord Krishna’ himself!   

 

‘Reasoning’,  as such came from a French word ‘raison de etre’ – i.e. a civilized  read way of reasoning -that is  what do we understand by reasoning in civilized society today?;

 

that way only ‘Judiciary’ always works on civilzed reasoning always;

 

why Evidence Act is also some civilized ‘reason’ based  idea and thought, used in all judicial pronouncements;

 

so the idea , ‘benefit of doubt surfaced’ in criminal jurisprudence, all over;

 

  • ‘Reason’  is obviously, a civilization  based idea indeed;

 

  • Politicians use same kind of reasoning for catching  ‘votes for’ under ‘god forsaken’  some new ideas, ‘to take on old thoughts’, just to replace again the old ideals to breath in , in a new Awatar;

 

 

  • Politicians would like ‘jallikattu of  TN’, likewise just  to ‘defrauding’  the poor tamilians in TN;

 

 

 

  • ‘ No party in TN is really people friendly’, as it ought to be in a venerable’ democracy’ as such!

 

 

-AIADMK  OPS or Sashikala Natarajan ; both ‘look for   

          power’ in TN by all means – Nothing More,

 

Nothing Less’;

 

  • So   on ‘Buffalo taming’ of Karnataka;

 

  • Karnataka in Karnataka, and elsewhere at the altar of so called very reasoning , replace, sooner than later, once they find honorable courts ‘outlaw’,the Jallukattu and likes, for ever one needs to know how politicians are great turncoats;
  • after all their main aim is just to get ‘votes’ anyway is their main objective in their life;
  • if not, ‘Party would die sooner than it is born, see what AAM Adhmi Party ‘ = AAP under Mr Kejriwal does;
  • he spoke one thing at Jantar Mandir under very man who promoted him then;
  • you would have seen how he treated Prof Yugesh yadav and Bhushan,;
  • so you can ask Where is that Arvind Kejriwal’s so called ideals then?  
  • He would say, ‘I need to go with them just to defeat sooner than later’ !

 

 

  • Therefore,  Alexander pope rightly called, ‘Politics is last resort of a (any) Scoundrel’;

 

 

 

  • if you remember now , many would have been forgeten today;

 

 

 

  • as the ‘new genere’ of educated ‘forget’ what they learnt in just earlier ‘class’ once he passes out of that class;
  • either rightly royally passing or getting promoted, or under  some kind of ‘reservation ideas of politicians ‘ since mid 1980s

 

 

– and the like of which is seen  in southern, Eastern or Western Indian states ‘Politics’;

 

Did these worthies ‘bother about drought’ , ‘famine’, ‘suicides’ of agriculturists;

 

who just do ‘tamely’  feed the total population of India when the wealthy population too needs, (Be wealthy or any, could you survive without food grains to get your need of food?’) if and when they could not import food items of their choice,;

 

as some ‘Mr. Trumps’ do emerge in these gangs of ‘alleged Political Scoundrels’, find refuge in politics of ‘Convenient gaming’;

 

Why do very ‘Americans’ rise against Mr Trump like?;

 

Wait:

 

so too in India sooner or later, likely,  against Modi or any, if not get ‘forewarned’!

 

If forewarned you are fore armed!

 

but you will not be able to be like ‘smart’ Americans;

 

“as ‘we’ are all some great IGNORANT LOT’;

 

Like we say ‘Pattathan Pappanunulkku theriyum’ ( if brahmin is  properly hit, then only he will realize his errors’ says a Tamil saying);

 

as we like to call ourselves ‘ Nee Ulagam arinda Pommanatti non onnum ariya Kammanotti’ (Tamil) (‘ignorant fools” very ourselves are a great fact);

 

yes ‘We’ are dwelling in some ‘prehistoric times’ of ‘kinds’, even in the 21st century;

 

what a great achievement, we, as  Indians ought to know, never ever over-estimate yourself is sane thought. what  you did so far proves  your ‘great intellectual superiority thought’(that could backfire like any gun could do, it has no relationship with you as such). some men like Mr Modi as PM would ‘declare’ – He is the most intelligent or clever as our Mr Trump is doing; after all he is ‘also some kind of species like us only’, how could he be different . when his DNA is from our species only!

 

These kinds ‘thrive’ in politics;

 

the fact is Arvind Kejriwal, though some ‘well educated some Engineer’, once elected to CM in Delhi UT state, (yet he wanted fast to encash) once in his hands, he worked out how he could make, great ‘enlightenments’ as if  ‘dawned on him’ as if some kind  of modern  version of Buddha, like modern ‘Dalits’ are  playing today,

 

‘Today ‘Dalits’ want ‘creamy layer reservations’ to the very creamy layer, obviously denying very very poor ‘Dalits’ though the poor lot among them is the creamy lot brethern too!

 

Like in all other backward species of  classes, we see, in india;

 

Backward ‘creamy layer’ succeeded in getting reservation for their creamy lot in the presence of honoroble SC ruling in ‘Indrashahani v UOI case, thanks to munificence of Kerala then so called CM Mr. Karunakaran what a great ‘merciful heart’ you found in the fellow man by passing the so called creamy layer Act, like VP Singh did the basic ‘Mondal idea’ (unfounded statistical  correlations), that led PM Mr, Morarji Desai has to shelve that ‘great useless report’ (might be very Mondal himself  perhaps wished its shelving even if he were to be some ‘backward or similar kind’ person.

 

It is obvious kind of though’ as it is obvious,even a fool would not like he is also fooled’  but for,  how he could have made sch a great foundationless ‘great report’ is itsef a million $ question, for researchers on ‘Reservations’ Projects;

 

See great PM VP Singh(even warrior community men are like Jats, would need reservation for them too), (perhaps  he ‘may be’, some kind of ‘Backward community or some such ‘caste’ of the very U P itself;

 

even Rajas there were too from ‘all kinds of castes and communities’ in the Northern states unlike real ‘warrior class’ as such;

 

so that  the ‘great background’  would have made him to second the great ‘Mondal Report’, when it was alreaday in ‘shelved state’, languishing in Morarjibhsi’s cubboards;

 

he kept the report there he has to  financially account for ‘Mondal commission’s spends;

 

as he might have felt that  he unwittingly ordererd the very Commission called very ‘Mondal Commission’;

 

any way VP Singh ,moved swiftly, to see, so called constitutional amendment to emerge, then to make way for the commission –obviously overthrowing the very Art 14 of the very Constitution of india;

 

Now you could undesand and appreciate  ‘why Alexander Pope, a great poet called, ‘politics is the last resort of Scoundrels’, ;

 

would you deny ?, if so, how?, please explain?,

 

Else once again, ‘ the thought of politics is the last resort of scoundrels’ would get doubly asserted and ‘confirmed, is it not?

 

So rushwith your great opinions, I personally welcome sir.  

 

People in State of TN is very vociferous on ‘Jallikattu’;

 

Obviously, that they forgot TN lost almost all agricultural crops’;

 

(could it not mean people became some ‘depresed lot’;

 

 so they loved to go for Jallikattu as some ‘sport’, as their animals would get ‘no food to eat’ if so, ‘better we  kill  by this great ‘Jallikattu’ idea,;

 

just ‘ political parties ‘infuriated them’ to behave so;

 

as they behaved (may be ‘political scoundrellism’ ‘raised its heat’ – in some ‘Jallikattu idea’ to be promoted  (in the garb of some god forsaken custom or culture);

 

(you w’ll know now the ‘secrets of politicians’ scoundrallism!);

 

after all ‘innocent’ TN people as such are just some very badly ‘innocent’ by nature;

 

they can be used or misused;

 

so TN politicians just used the opportunity very swftly;

 

even ‘forcing and small children to participate in protests’ (fact is once supposed to be some culture or custom taboo  surfaced;

 

that has generated very women  to be treated as some ‘properties’ that would be ‘just like ‘things-like’ properties’, man  always wanted that idea could emerge to  misuse theirnown women under this great opportunity;

 

here, they(women and children) are ‘Obviously’  misused  that cannot be just ‘dismissed’;

 

is obvious fact to be noted ‘by all women, men’, who support women as equal partners and to be liberated;

 

However.may be some ‘great Sati’ supporters might resurrect; and emerge in TN, under in a  great culture garb; that need to be subscribed, by a statute; then they would force a statute like they did for Jallikattu, which evoked so many new customs like in a Pandora box;

 

Whether honorable SC supports the ‘Jallikattu’ is no big thought now;

 

after all, the question is  ‘whether you have sound ‘great Common SENSE’ is the billion $ Question of this 21st century? !

 

ONLY FUTURE ‘ OF WOMEN OF TN will say, IS womenhood is  OBVIOUSLY IN STAKE, – any sane man might say; Why very great AIADMK general secretary Sashaikala if ‘sane’  would have bear out, – yea she is a woman she woukd need safety from very Nar=tarajan her own husband, who is tricky man every one why Sashikala knows;

 

If you have different opinion please, you too have a say here!

 

Reasoning is obviously ‘lost’ by Manu in some  just misplaced ideas  like ‘Sati’ idea to say the least:

 

Manu would hijack to the poor ‘the great inhuman ideas’; as he thinks ‘poor people’ would simply accept him, as if  as a great thinker f his class;

 

but it is  his reasoning is so badly ‘faulted reason\ing’ any one  among sensible people would adduce, sooner than later;

 

as he ‘lost’ his own perception of what reasoning is as such, thanks to his ‘lovely support’ to AIADMK;

 

perhaps he is some ‘Chinnamma’ fake  follower or fake supporter, proped by her husband Natarajan, i sometimes do tend to think, as his ‘vociferous’ support to ‘Jallikattu’ is much more in proportions compared to ‘drought hit issue in TN’, due to failure of monsoons and Cavery ‘scanty water’ supply from Karnataka’ for failure of monsoon which took away so many lives – do you find any great reasons in Manu?

Per intel reports, Jallikattu is augmented by anti national forces; obviously TN govt bowed to them by passing an Ordinance and as a result some some TN Act,  obviously the statute is a product of  poor governance of a secular democracy is obvious; that might call for hon Apex court need to quash the very governor’s Ordinance, as an ill-advised idea .

(ends )

 

(i) Whether the notification dated 8th November 2016 is ultra vires Section 26(2) and Sections 7,17,23,24,29 and 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; (ii) Does the notification contravene the provisions of Article 300(A) of the Constitution; …

 

(ii) Does the notification contravene the provisions of Article 300(A) of the Constitution; (iii) Assuming that the notification has been validly issued under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 whether it is ultra vires Articles 14 and 19 of the Co…

 

(iii) Assuming that the notification has been validly issued under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 whether it is ultra vires Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution; (iv) Whether the limit on withdrawal of cash from the funds deposited in bank ac…

 

(iv) Whether the limit on withdrawal of cash from the funds deposited in bank accounts has no basis in law and violates Articles 14,19 and 21; (v) Whether the implementation of the impugned notification(s) suffers from procedural and/or substantive …

 

(v) Whether the implementation of the impugned notification(s) suffers from procedural and/or substantive unreasonableness and thereby violates Articles 14 and 19 and, if so, to what effect? …

(vi) In the event that Section 26(2) is held to permit demonetization, does it suffer from excessive delegation of legislative power thereby rendering it ultra vires the Constitution; (vii) What is the scope of judicial review in matters relating to…

 

(vi) In the event that Section 26(2) is held to permit demonetization, does it suffer from excessive delegation of legislative power thereby rendering it ultra vires the Constitution; (vii) What is the scope of judicial review in matters relating to…
(vii) What is the scope of judicial review in matters relating to fiscal and economic policy of the Government; (viii) Whether a petition by a political party on the issues raised is maintainable under Article 32; and (ix) Whether District Co-operat…

Dr chandrachud Dhananjay as justice and two other Justices is no dissent on ‘secularism of the constitution paradigm as such.
It is not to say that the law makers to decide such fundamental issues never meant,
that the present law makers among them includes the opposition law makers.
they need to be taken into consideration,
and that means ‘opposition law makers;
if it was a healthy strong opposition’
that dissent may consider;
but such issues like on the Constitutional preferences has to be decided by the backing of ‘referendum principle’ like in the case of Brexit in the UK; Brexit was adopted through referendum is the obvious way forward for secularism of the constitution ;

so it is obvious their dissent is no dissent on Secular ideals as the members of the constitution bench which said that secularism does not mean the political parties can decide issues by ‘going away’ from the secular fundamental ideals of the constitution of india is my considered opinion;

secularism as such the ‘basic principle of the indian constitution,

in the similar way even ‘demonetization is; Modi government alone cannot decide the’demonetization’ without referendum to people (referal to the people of india -as citizen is sovereign in india not parliament as it is an instrument under Art 12 it has to refer sch main issues to the people of india, as demonetization is no political policy but people daily issue, so referendum route has to have been adopted by Mod govt, it failed is obvious, that very question is like the UK govt sought referendum on the exit from EU; the referendum said in 52% majority said ‘we have to go out of EU’ – that only made Cameron to resign on the issue; similar position is in india too; for india is based upon the UK or British constitutional principles; though the British constitution is an unwritten constitution,except magna carta and bill of rights; yet it followed ‘referendum’ process – why the British parliamentarians are mentally advanced to ensure the major issues ought to go through the ‘referendum process’ so they followed, they sustained the Breixt even today; so what Mamta WB CM that LK Advaniji ot Arun Jaitleyji be nominated as PM in place of Modiji is indeed a tenable argument, unquestionably as indian constitution s modelled on the British constitution as also the American constitution is my considered opinion, by default, as she sought for different objective, yet her view is correct constitutionally..

‘No Authentic Proof of any – When you are what Caste as such? You can never be able to say ever!’


Prof. Guru Balakrishnan PhD.M.L.

“True Loving is not Passive ‘taking’, but a dynamic ‘giving’.”

-Chinmayananda.

Introduction

Anyone can marry any one from ‘the mankind system’ from anywhere, that instantly kills ‘the idea of castes’, as such; it further states, ‘any woman’ takes the ‘surname’ of her husband.once she marries or cohabitates (in the past ‘living in’ with any man confers her the surname of that man), an aother fact. to assertain the fact, just a dynamic ‘giving in’, obviously not passive ‘taking’.

Time immemorial , since ‘Ramayana days’, Sita joined Rama, so she is noted as ‘Sitarama’, so too all joined ‘Radha’ became Krishna’s loves, so they are called ‘Radhas’ though they were hailing from so many different persons, as most ‘Radhas’ are calledjust ‘Radhas’ only meaning Krishna’s loves only.

In the same period, in the Mahabharata age, Draupathy married Arjun, who shared her with his brothers – ‘Pancha Pandavas’, thanks to their mother Kunti’s dispensation to share cohabitation under ‘living in ideas’ with other brothers, that way Draupathy is considered  as ‘Chaste woman’ , restricting cohabitation with the five specific men -Pandavs.

When Duryodhana wanted to share her with him too, when Yudhishtra lost her in the game of ‘Dice’ under contract of winner gets right over him. She terribly objected, and that was the precursor for the Mahabharatha Kurushetra war, every one of you know.

When Kings or Princes marry they marry any other King’s daughter(s), meaning there was ‘no restrictions’ of any religion, or any caste as such, as every King is considered, since time immemorial , he is from ‘Warrior clan’ (Kshatriya clan) (sanskrit);

Similarly, any one is a merchant, or trader, industrialist , he or she is just called as ‘Merchant class’ (vysyas clan) (Sanskrit); So on with with ever profession or occupation that is all; how can we divide ‘these classification’ as ‘backward’ and forward; after all ‘Economy ‘ of every one normally fluctuates every now and then, for there is no hard and fast rules as such.   

You might have seen even most ‘Maharishis’ (Saints or Seers) (dheerga dharshis) , (one is bestowed with abilities to forsee things)  married women from different communities, like that these women were called wife of Maharishi, obviously very learned person he was declared , therefore severa; Kings time immemorial sent their wards to their Gurukuls, (these Gurukuls are unlike todays’ ashrams where ‘rapes’ are common, daily reported in media); in fact , the ‘Gurukuls’ definitely gave good meaningful education, (they never said like Modi ,PM of India today, saying , ‘Science is universal, technology (tantra) as some local work mechanics (after all education by very nature is Universal perception.

Similarly in Pali Culture (in India Tamils Culture) , Avvaiyar ( a great tamil poetess( Born of a parentage , father from priestly class and her mother from ‘helpers’ class (Sudhras) (Saskrit) (there was no Scheduled castes or tribes as such [but some concoction by the British India, ] said, in Tamil language – ’ Jhadhi irandu ozhiya verillai, satrumkal, Ittar Priore, Idadhar Izhikulatjoor. Pattangil Ullapadi’. I.e per  in the Yore (highest learning texts) , it is said, ‘there are just ‘two classes of people’, One is thouse who ‘give to any one’ is a ‘superior class of people’; those who ‘desists giving’ is called the ‘most inferior class of people’;

How cold a politician just play with his imaginary ideas about castes and classes of people – this problem started right from ‘Justice Party of India’ in Tamilnadu, tamely followed by the British Indian Government, by so called ‘rotation of roster’ in employment opportunities then; then like the British PM RamsayMacDonald, tamely used the classification in a most clever  to ‘divide and rule’ the Indian communities, as he could put ‘one against the other’ in case of serious conflicts if arises; same idea Dr. Ambedkar worked for the so called ‘SCs  and STs’ (when such communities never existed but just helping castes in Agriculture called Sudhras(servants class) which only tilled the earth and provided food grains, like, rice, wheat….so on); but he used a new classification called ‘Dalits’ (followers of Gautam Buddha of Kapilavasthu of 6th Cent BC) ; Buddha never played with the lives of people but British education (as Lord Macaulay said, ‘ to tame Indians’ covert them to poverty, that is possible by injecting western education system , that way , he made Indians abject poor, poor , rich, and wealthy and the like, that way he divided the Indians who never experienced ‘poverty as such’ even under Moghal rule. That is historical perception of India.

Similarly V P Singh developed the idea of Backward, other backward, and so on, under Mondal commission idea   which was just a study of the british ‘rotation of roaster’ for indians to get jobs only, nothing else, which is also most inaccurate study which then PM Mr Morarji Desai in 1974 just ‘shelved’, just because ‘ statistics provided therein obviously clumsy without any fundamentals (which our great judges could not decipher being obvious , under the facade of ‘Judicial restraint’ (most misused paradigm) (always questioned rightly in the U S A Supreme court by very judges themselves, when some protogonists like Frackfurter, Stone were there; that way several times USSC Judges just declared ‘ultra vires’ of any statutes that tried to affect the American Constitution, but in India otherway around in the early stages, thinking Indian Politicians including Jawaharlal Nehru as PM just misused the Indian Constitution to empower the parliament, that way he was responsible for the Sch IX in the first Constitutional Amendment, every one needs to know that he was the very man upset the Art 13 power of the fundamental rights wel crafted by the Constituent Assembly in 1947.

Indian politicians from day one indeed one kind of ‘crafty men’ like Mr Trump of the USA, trying to become (now to be – ‘the president of the USA, obviously by his ‘crafty instincts’ (he may not succeed there); he must have learnt that ‘crafty art’ from Indian Politicians only, who always ‘played’ ‘drama’ of ‘working for the poor’ but just ‘fooling the very poor’ only)

  

Politics today just msread and misconstrue the interpretation of  the ideal of ‘Education’ as such.

Politicians today just a variety like Mr.Trump , a contestant for the office of President of the USA, just rolling out all kinds of ‘PR’ tactics, just to reach out to his aim to become President, a shrewd tactic.

That way the past PM in V P Singh rolled out the idea of ‘Mondal Commission’, though he never constituted the commission, but by the predecessor PM Morarji Desai who shelved the very Commission’s report saying , it had all ‘wrong statstics’ and irrelevant ‘statistical reasoning’: but V P Singh missued the irrelevant statistics to fool around the people, that way he massacred several students by making them to commit ‘immolations’ when tey questioned the validity of his great foolhardy idea of castes; Constitutional Court , the Apex court called the ‘Supreme Court of India, then, to took ‘umbrage’ under ‘Judicial Restraint’, and allowed him to gladly misuse the idea of ‘Backward classes’, when there is no ‘castes’ at all just because ‘castes’ ideas are just ‘imaginary’ thoughts , that politicians misused from Mr Ramsay McDonald, the then British PM, controlling British India, prior to Indian Independence.

——

Why no authenticity?

One needs to note, Life begins for any, by following some  or any ‘occupation’ ; after all that ‘Occupation’ worked,  causes one’s identity, in any society.

What do we understand by ‘Grahastasra Dharamam’?

What we call as ‘Grahasthsra dharma, obviously, based on what ‘occupation’ you follow’?

 Our life becomes highy activated , by this ‘dharma’:

– once one gets married, by saying his ‘occupation’ or ‘profession’ ; and express his progeny;

  • but today the very man lost  his ‘identity’ touch with the reality of ‘love and relationship’:
  • with a fellow  new female entering his household;
  •  unfortunately, he thinks  his ‘‘wife’ is still some ‘foreign object’ (not human like him) :
  • and he treats so;
  • -that means he lost touch with ‘reality’ what he has to  be as ‘humanistic person’;
  • I came across several persons as grooms just they think ‘wife’, as a provider of ‘sexual desire’ ends ;(you could have seen, one such, in a Delhi family court, one man petitioned , that his pregnant wife did not allow him to have sex with her so it should be treated as ‘cruelty’ as a ground for divorce, promptly ‘family court rejected, so too the Delhi high court. – what do you gather here on 6th November 2016 court cases ).
  • and not ‘family life’ ;
  • that only ‘offends’, the progeny ‘factor’, in the shape of children;
  • when ‘love with wife’ breaks, the ‘life of’ children is just lost ;
  • and children feel, ‘unwanted’;
  •  Get ‘dejected’ and lot of ‘some weak minded’ commit suicides ;
  • or fall a prey to all kinds of ‘terrors’;
  • who is responsible?  ‘this ‘great’ man only is responsible;
  • as he is ‘ not accommodative anymore’ wiife; ’where is the Grahasthasram dharma?
  • his  own ‘previous generations’, that ‘respected’ the ‘grahasthasrama dharam’;
  • if you cannot ‘look after your wife’, what you can be ‘trusted at all’ , do you not think, ‘Man’ (called as ‘new era bridegroom’ turned  new fangled ‘husband’)?

When you are untrustworthy , even for yourself, What ‘caste ‘ you talk about’ sir?

Are you a caste of ‘untrustworthiness caste’?

Any one who is ‘untrustworthy’ is considered to be the most  inferior caste – as Avvaiyar said,

‘Jadi irandu ozhia verillai, ‘Ittar  ‘perioore’’ ‘Idadhar’ Izhikulatthoor’ (Tamil)

Ie;

The one gives (accommodative too ) is representing ‘Superior caste – highly respectable caste’; those who do not give is one called ‘most inferor community (caste) – as there are only ‘two castes’, as stated above.

You are not reliable even for you, you do not know  when you can break the marriage bond yourself,;

just like that, at the ‘drop of hat’ which you don’t know yourself;

   So you cannot trust yourself is very obvious;

when so, how poor lady who joins you as wife can trust you dear?,

as you are some ‘great mercurial person’ only is further obvious;

when you are such worthless person, how you could be trusted by the woman who enters your doubtful house manners house, sir?

– that house you choose to call ‘with pride’ as some superior kind ‘caste’ person as such you presume?;

,If the ‘ house ‘is obviously ‘worthless to be trusted’ as you prove by your behavior, obviously, it is  ‘no longer worth’ to be treated as ‘a great house’ at all;

{I would recommend all ‘grooms ‘ to be must deposit some Rs.     25  lacs in fixed deposit to be goven to the ‘bride to be’ once before marriage solemnization. In the grooms defaukt manners, she takes the money as some ‘safe security for her’.}

as the ‘people’ who own that house are not just ‘humans’ at all you proved by your behavior when you choose to discard the woman after using her as ‘some sex object’ , is the character you have.

Can’t you  realize?

but poor girl realizes and tries to run away,out of ‘consternation more so?

that means you make that situation by your meaningless ‘lothsome’ ideas for ‘corrupt moneys’  called by name as ‘dowerys’ moneys; and the like , and all the more you need to enslave that poor girl, is proved s it not?

when so how could you dare say,  ‘you are  some ‘gentleman’ need to be loved at all costs?(some kind of great Mr Trump of the USA)

that way, you, as ‘the great husband’ you don’t deserve that place of ‘husband’ as such at all;

but you ‘claim’ like an ‘unsocial’ claim that you are some ‘gentleman’, if so, what ‘caste’ you belong sir? You better assess yourself. ;

as you don’t seem to realize , perhaps:

Huband means ‘hus’ = ‘husbandry type’. that binds the both’ but you don’t deserve to be given the title of ‘husband’ is it not?

Don’t you think so?

When you are unfit to be a ‘husband’ (wherein there in ‘no castes’ are involved; but mutual regard and respect for each other only ,

nothing more, nothing less,

that is called the great ‘Grahasthasram dharam’, paradigm.

When you are not fit to be a husband, unlike  the past generation of husbands;

what right you ‘to claim’, some traditions as such , don’you think so?

Obviously , you don’t deserve any sympathy under some so called consideration like caste based, (when ‘caste as such ‘never a reality’ ;

But some ‘self imposed ‘discipline);

which you just had shattered by your own volition.

If so, what clalms you can seek ?

Under what ‘ Reservation’ please sir?

You don’t deserve any reservation, you know yourself;

just face the world as it is;

that is called the ‘right governance paradigm’, by any meaningful governments to be.

You just cannot clain ‘citizenship’ when you lost the ‘finesse’ of citizenship.

You ought to realize in the first instance:

(politicians are the product of politics;

– Politicians’ so called patriotism ( scoundralism) (what they talk about) is nothing but last resort of a Scoundrel -like with downright scoundralism.)’ eg, MPs had last 20 years had as special assistants some foreign spies in very indians – do you find real patriotism,when a Pak spy in India when caught has informed indian police when he was caught and arrested, he said for Rs.10,000.- to Rs.100,000.- remunertion Indian counterparts sold defence of india details, this seems going on last 20 years or so, might be earlier too, who knows?

These kinds profess ‘Patriotism’ mascot!

How dare the Parliament is to call itself SOVERIGN?

You are used by the ‘politicians’, in  the way he likes;

that way you are just treated today, what use to cry on Spilt Milk sir? That kind is some ‘castes ‘ seem professing today.

Unless you have ‘wisdom’ – first know,

how to run your own household, in an orderly way, certainly not, like ‘scoundrels’  in political class , is obvious to you too, by ‘revelations, revealed day in and day out.

‘Scoundrels’ are treated in scoundrel like; way or manner only by any,

given an opportunity.

You are ’ not to be respected like ‘Lochinvar’ any more;

but you are a some kind of ‘worst mentally  weak duckling’ like,

unworthy to be entrusted with any thing is the greatest fact, you proved of late, as a husband too.

So the recent ‘Nobel winning Contract theory’ rightly questions and observes that  ‘all contracts today’;

as the ‘men behind’ those contracts obviously ‘look for holes’

to cause as much breaches as possible,

what contract you talk about?

You could have seen when the other day Supreme court of india said in ‘crystal clear way;

the government has failed to appoint judges suggested for appointments to high courts and even the very supreme court, as per the Constitutional proprieties as stated in the constitution;

which only created the ‘institutions’;

but the government of ‘politicians’, like the great ‘modern boneless husbands’,

just run for divorces of the own chosen wife,

as you. as a husband do not understand the term;

.’what is meant by your own chosen wife’?

Obviously, do not understand, what is’ ‘commitment of oath’

in the marriage by ‘Saptapadi’:

Similarly the government of india is formed under the Constitutional oath to protect the constitution;

But ‘it ‘blatently  violates the terms of the instrument of ‘oath of office’;

the so called ministers had taken,

(like by such vicious claims of the ‘great worthless ‘ husbands, invoke at the ‘family courts’ ;

by the so called ‘famished laws’,

made by mentally emaciated law makers;

as some so called ‘ill conceived  perceptions’ on ‘institutionslized (marriages as such.);

,that way the governent just not appointed the relevant judges already recommended;

( but held up the appointments, under ‘so called claims that the judges are not of  right quality,

like husband accuses his wife of ‘adultary ‘ of such kind of claims, obviously the contractual oblication is just vitiated).

If the judges just nominated by the Apex courts already worked as Judges earlier for pretty long many years;

if you had any problem you should have said, when, they are not fit to be judges then and there;

but now today why?,

obviously  governments’ idea is to appoint some ‘slave mentality judges ‘

so that,

some kind of so called BSY type men are to get acquitted,

like the other day the CBI court had acquitted, thanks to CBI just not appropriately prosecuted,

that shows the governnents power manipulated CBI investigators to help acquittal of BSY kinds,

that means it is obvious failure in understanding the ‘constitutionl proprieties as such,

that kind only led the Nobel awarded ‘Contrat theory’ says. How true is again proved by the CBI getting acquittal of BSY or like men;

You know if the new judges as recommened are appointed now at the respective courts as suggested by the Apex court, by the government,

the great central government finds any serious problems could move ‘impeachment proceedings’,

subject to ‘parlimentarians’ correctly arriving at the right decision on the ‘Impeachment proceedings’, obviously enlightens;

that, the ‘decision on impeachment’ calls for very many ‘law makers have to decide, after hearing their cases. as presented by their advocacy of prosecutors and the respondents,

not at the grand idea of PM or so called law minister alone,

 obviously cannot decide on the improprieties of any, that is obvious position of Art 14 itself,

judges also have their own fundamental rights too that cannot be swallowed by the great PM or the Law minister is prime ‘patent factor’ to be given credence.

So, obviously so called ‘castes reservations’, on the fact of non existent castes cannot be called as great castes,

by some public servants or a few law makers;

but should be accepted nothing less than 2/3rds majority of both the loksabha and rajya sabha in a joint sitting ;

and once passed as an act is again subject to scrutiny of the high courts concerned;

as also the Apex courts;

by suitable legal petitions or suo motu action of the courts’ jurisdiction concerned;

obviously the PMO or the LMO ‘cannot’ decide any legal issues is very obvious, one needs know.

Therefore, thus, we  analyse on the ‘proprieties of occupations’, as such;

that way only ‘Occupations’ assumed importance;  only ‘it’ decided the division of labor issues;

division of labor only created castes,

under ‘Skills Aspects’ as such.

Thus we move forward here below;

 

You know even today, if one is a carpenter, or blacksmith, or cobler, or shepperd, or milkman, that is he  chooses to call himself accordingly.

He never says what he was before.

You could have seen someone like Parsis they call themselves by their occupation,

like liqor seller calls ‘dharuwala’, an engineer he calls himself as Engineer, like Faruq Engineer, some one is from Mistry work, like Palonji ‘Mistry’ (builders) he callls himself  as ‘Mistry’, one seller of Boats, a dealer of steels, he is called ‘Lokhande’ or ‘Steelwala’, he calls himself as Bamboat, and so on.

Same  and similar way only, in the early Indian society,

agriculturist, calls ‘Agri’, barbars (hair dresser) he calls himself ‘Naiks’ and so on, so  on and so forth,

That way things of ‘caste’, surfaced,is the ‘historical determination.

Therefore, it will be obvious  when the ‘caste based reservation ‘ came as Mr Ramsay McDonald PM of Britain, in British  India developed , thanks to ‘Justice Party’ headed by Late Mr.  Bhatavatsalam, a Minister in the then Madras Government forced Mr Ramsay McDonald to give ‘caste based rotation roster system ‘ in jobs;

that way ‘Rotation idea surfaced’ in British India, that way idea of forward , backward communities surfaced in 1920s or so.

I had seen that  my father was one affected by this great idea, till his 27th year of age, he could not get any job, though he was selected five times, 4 times he lost the job opportunity at the altar of the  ‘rotation of roster’ in railways.

He was directly selected by the District Traffic  superintendent,(DTS)  of South Indian Railways, at Trichy (TN),

as my father’s father(grand father) retired after 35 years of the honest honorable service in railways as a chief clerk;

that way ‘forward community’ people have to prove their merit in their jobs, else, they were just ‘shunted out’  from services;

that way I acquired my classification as ‘government public servants’class..

Obviously, our ‘earlier’ occupations just ‘dissolved’ into new classification.

Morarji Bhai’s  as PM of India ,after Smt Indira Gandhi as PM,  appointed Mondal an M.P to go into the details on the caste system,

how  the British evaluated by the British Indian government under British P.M, Mr.Ramsay McDonald, to enable Morarji to use the wisdom;

of that great ‘rotation  system’; after the study , the report by Mondal definitely proved a lot of defects apart from statistical perspective of the castes, there were several lacunae how the caste system  first of all evolved?,

how continued?; how long it persisted? There are no ‘definite answers’ to correctly evaluate, that led him not to rely the system, for the ‘rotation’ idea was just to ‘divide and rule’ paradigm he assessed; and so he shelved the report as ‘most unreliable’ without adequate researches ;

for there were no sociological researches base could be obtained, from the shelves of universities of India.

But one study of Taxasila study, based on historical perspectives based but that did not correctly say anything in clear terms, except that the peoples occupations only is the clue, from the civilization s of Persia, and Greeks.

So ‘Rotation’ system also could not stand scrutiny;

as there were ‘No castes basically,;

but always ‘depended on the skills’ of the individuals supplemented by, the ‘family’s occupations which they consistently followed over centuries, not sporadically.

Like refugees do any work that cannot be any measure at all.

That way right and reasonable measurement is what one followed over decades became the ‘occupation’;

like we say how ‘character ‘ is evaluated is , ‘what one does repeatedly behave again and again help build one’s charater.

If one robs people repeatedly over years would become the characteristic of the famiily, that way , the people ibndulged in highway robbery over years were classified as ‘criminal tribes’;

likewise every repeated work over several generation if the community follwed that avocation only could determine the skills what his hands can be nimble of is determined.

So in a Parish, any one indulges in preaching several generations qualified him as a ‘Preacher’ ;

likewise ‘warriors’ (fighters) community, too were developed, and that way every kind of division of labor did surface is the only possible perception.

So any one could gain skills in any area that depended on how long he took interest in that ‘skilll area’ what the Skill Development Project ‘ is all about.

If one gain sklls in taking ‘bribes’ he became Master in Bribes taking’ so the idea of Liason  management skill is all about, even any area of managing, that way we have MBA courses today that are run by universities!.

That only caused alot of corruption areas today, like in smugglings, gold smuggling, and like, today we have several builders cheat the flat buut ers, but  till he is caught he is the honest man on earth.

Skill can be anything , it depends on what skills you choose ultimately determines your ‘occupation’ (you get occupied with that skill area development), Nothing more, nothing less.Like IT software.

You could have noted in the media reports on Marathwada, where a lot of people started using ST reservations by getting ST certificates and gained jobs entrries, besides they got promotions under the very ST quotas, just depriving the real STs classified, the number alone in Maharashtra civil services exceeded more than 100,000 officers in maharashtra govt since 1976 it was reported.

You could have seen ‘massive corruption’ at various certification levels, the ‘such great masquerading as ST officers community acquired promotions and  many held top government positions, obviously due to political obvious support, it was revealed.

What ‘Sovereign power they hold tell me?’

Aurangabad bench of High Court of Bombay high court stayed the government notification of exonerating such fraudulent officers instead of punishing them;

the court asked the government of Maharashtra to pass an Act of the legislature clearly ‘exoneratibg such corrupt practices’ to allow such ‘officers’ to continue in the top posts.

The CM of maharashtra himself headed such Tribal Advisory Committe, but today the TAC is non functional and its repirt in ‘cold storage

like condition’.. Same like ‘ Mondal commission report during Morarji Bhai’s cabinet in 1980s.

But great ‘intellectually ‘great honest brains like VP Singh ‘ did misuse the useless shoddy Mondal report to create the so called   shoddy ‘reservations for so called backward classes’, followed by other backward classes, then great mentally corrupt congress CM of Kerala Mr. Karunakaran passed ‘another shoddy so called reservation ‘ for ‘creamy layer reservations’ after the hn SC verdit on Idra shahani v Union of India case of 1980s.

These kinds of ‘shoddys’ emerged due to political patronisation, which was not questioned by lackadisical judiciary caught in so called ‘judicial restraint’ paradigm, leading the public to evaluate the state is failing leading to the constitutional crisis’ just because Apex court failed to use Art 142,144, to advice the President to invoke Art 352  to dissolve such shoddy parliament then filled with these kind of corrupt law makers, representing the voters  to usher in the ‘so called corrupt policies’ characteristically to make the people just to be the mute spectators of corrupt activities of the politicians characteristically ‘absolutely’ corrupt to get into any levels of corruption to cheat the voters in the so called nsme of Democratic India

Obviously, several times ‘judicial restraint’ idea is just forced to be misused by the politics played; obviously for the ‘self preservation’ of ‘Absolutely Corrupt Politicians’ today too masquerading as ‘great leaders’ of several political parties.

Such kinds number went on increasing that made one local political party in maharashtra to force ‘film producers’ to shell out Rs. 5 crores, in the name of the film producers’  having used Pakistan film personalities, as some forced donation to Army jawans, which is promptly rejected by  the Army establishment, every one is aware of.

Problem is politicians misuse by perverting the sociological perspectives of so called ‘Never Ever was a Caste as such’!

Just because you confered on the Parliament such power to say, but these law makers now say the Parliament is Sovereign, but in fact Parliament in India can never be sovereign as very Parliament itself is an Art 12 institution, when so how can this Parliament can claim ‘Sovereign Power’, why don’t you question these worthies please?

I am feeling how Indians after independence in 1947, still feeling like ‘subjects’ as they were under British Indian governments, since the time they were under Rajas. Sultans, Kings, after Vaishali confederacy, (Gautama Buddha was born there in the 6th cent BC),

It appears once subjects , they ever think so, that is sad indeed.

Even Lord Krishna ‘Dwarakha’ was a ‘confederacy’ – clear open democracy!

Indus valley civilization itself emanated from ‘democratic fundamentals, they knew No man is an Island, that doesn’t mean they can be enslaved!

But today politicians world over  try to enslave, like Mr. Trump ideas try to,

these ideas are not ideals but rich and wealthy wants to rule over you.

So Mrs. Hillary Clinton, however she is bad but less burdensome of Mr Trump, for the USA, might turn out to be the first Lady President of the USA by 8th November 2016.

She needs to expand the economy to accommodate the Poor and Needy immigrants too,

American citizen is promptly Intelligent when Trump tried to psyche the citizens – even ‘Whites’ but ‘immigrants’ really corrected the course correction, if you observe how the US election is moving around.

Mr. Trump himself just arbitrary person just tried to torpedo ‘Women power’.

Promptly, the women of the USA are more intelligent than ‘Men’ even in the USA.

Worse still, Indian Judiciary though more powerful yet it is very meek, under so called ‘Judicial Restraint’ paradigm.

Thus it miserably failed, when the !st constotutional Amendment surfaced with schedule IX,;

thank God it (sch IX ) was  ‘ultra vires’  the Indian Constitution since 2007 when  a constitutional bench of CJI Mr Y K Sabharwal declared so in the case ‘(Legal heir) Coelho v/s State of Tamil Nadu.

When indians will learn is a million $ question? , i used to wonder.

May be, when Indian Apex court judges turn more independent thinkers in their interpretation of the Indian  Constitution,

Emperors

then they could handle course correction of Indian politicians, else some Amit Shahs (BJP) soon declare Indian ‘dictatorship’ to assert as new Emperors.

You need to assert as
Indian free citizen not subjects to any one, realize..

Else you may end up with another one hundred constitutional amendments just to dilute the solid structure of the Indian Constitution.

Hope you are aware Art 13 was being diluted, by the very first constitutional Amendment in 1956.

You need to know there is no caste and gender difference at all as all men and women are just as equal as the other, you will know.

Never allow the politicians to ‘gag ‘ you, for heaven’s sake!.

(Ends)

Notes

All MPs antecedents as also all MLAs antecedents be checked forthwith; as it is proved for the last 20 yrs MPs did fail under Art 51A of part IV A of the constitution; if any wrongdoings is found such MPs MLAS need be removed by their respective parties forth with, election commission need to take all relevant police and intelligence reports on all nominations received; if police and intelligence clearance if not recd , never permit them to contest elections, country’s safety is more important than these parties’ interests is my considered opinion .

In the same way every groom and bride need proper verification about their antecedents, then only you can reduce litigation of any kind.

WHEN NOTHING IS CERTAIN of PERPETUAL USE (OBVIOUSLY CONTROLLED   BY  ‘LOC’;  WHAT TAXATION  ACHIEVES FOR YOU, YOU NEED TO KNOW, WHEN YOU ARE PERPETUALLY TAXED MORE and MORE FOR THE VERY  ‘SAME OR SIMILAR’ PURPOSE(S)?

 

HOW  WOULD YOU CALL THIS IS TRUSTWORTHY  “ NATIONAL GOVERNANCE” SYSTEM?

By Prof GURU Balakrishnan.

W

Special Notes:

 

  1. Hope, ‘Indians ‘ understand what is ‘LOC’ (Line of Control) (in the ancienct Krita yuga)  

             ‘indian culture), we  had .’Brahmmastharam’) , seif imposed self control – even Anjaneya    

(Hanuman) accepted  when administered  by Ravan used on him in Lanka, then he ‘stood controlled’ when Ravana’s soldiers tied his ‘tail’ and did put fire to it, though he could break the ‘Brahmmastaram’ but he did not, says,’ Ramayana’, again , we talk Ayodhya Ram Mandir and all that’ why we do not want to impose on  ourselves very self same ‘self control’ , a limitation principle!’, we  need to ‘self introspect’ as we all try to say we follow Hindu (Indian Culture); you can’t be  selective Indians!!’

 

2 Sri Ram accepted his father Dasarath’s dispensation when he has to follow his promised  

            oath to Khaikeye’ that , as and when she needed he would give  in to her wishes.(Law of  Contract obligation) very ‘religiously’; thus Rama agreed to go to 14 years to dwelling forests  

giving in to Bharat’s Coronation, though, however much very Bharat pleaded Ram not to accept the exile, That way , he spent full 14 years in the forest dwels, every one of Indians know this position, ( I wonder how he forgets the ‘Law of Contract ‘ today as such) – Does it mean he wants to cause a ‘breach of trust’ in a very casual manner?. Besides, Sri Ram respected ‘Sitaji’, and that way he made her golden image to perform ‘Aswamedayaga’ then.  Sitaji was most respected in the Dasaradha’s household unlike today ‘Bride’ burning or other cruelties are very common today; but we do Sri Ram Bajans as also Sita Bajans – obvious ‘farce’ drama of 21st century.

 

  1. Marriages are considered to be very sacred contracts like very ‘Brammasthara’ under the  

idea of ‘Institution of marriages’ and thevy‘institution of  the family’ as such – how we talk about ‘breaches of such institution of marriage, a sacred contract under ‘Saptapadi’(‘seven steps’), a some casual contract like, by our so called ‘divorce laws’, though under the institution of marriage has to be till the death of a spouse in the couple, but today, ‘breach of marriage’ is permitted right royally, doesn’t mean we really treat the Law of Contract itself is a futile exercise – if so why you have different understanding of Law of contract, ‘MOU’ under Society’s registration Act, charitable institutions Act, companies Act, Taxation Act, and what not…; obviously we misused  and squandered the very ‘rule of law’ as such is obvious, is it not?

 

  1. In ‘Dwapara yuga, when Lord Krishna lived, ‘people  did not follow strict laws as such, but  

yet, they had very consistent in regard married lives, unlike today, law makers turn into Gods    

give dispensations, obviously, in a most degererated ways; leading to contempt of laws,  

meaning ‘you are not amenable to any contracts at all today’ .If so, do we at all need   

Judiciary at all, very judiciary need to think, if it fails in its obligations of ‘strict law of  

Contracts’; How theen Art 51A of Part IVA of the Indian Constitution is viable, when it under  

so called ‘Judicial restraint ‘ allowed all ‘mush rooming’ legislations’ besides so called  

‘Constitutional amendments. Don’t you think so Mr Judge?, any indian would tend to ask .

 

  1. We mostly live in all ‘falsities’. Laws ans statutes are not really respected. See what  

Karnataka  and the Union governments do in respecting SC orders today in Cavery dispute, mostly by ‘contempt’ that is your modern India    which is more consistent in dishonring the constitution than in its honoring every one knows. India is just some kind of Management only, Why whole world too. India can take some solace when it sees the world as India is some kind of follower, rather than a real ‘Leader’ like its its glorious past.  

 

“Difference between Policy and routine Management is yet to be known one can see if ? But Governments taxation is o policy but just some Management……

 

Policy (Obviously easily reachable objectives with sincere efforts) is like what APJ Abdul Kalam suggested/ advised youth: (So youth in India just

                       Love him, like a great ‘Teacher’ (Guru))

 

Policy (a Philosophy) is likely to read like: ‘the Pledge’: (Doing hings Rightly)  

                                                                (Leadership):

 

                ‘I will pursue  my education,or the work with dedication and I will excel in it;

                    From now on, I will  teach at least 10 persons to ‘read and write’,those who  

                       cannot read and write; I will plant,  at least 10 sapplings to grow trees,in my

                       Neighbourhood and shall ensure ‘their growth’ through constant care; I will              visit   rural and urban areas and permanently  wean at least 5 persons from ‘addiction’,       and ‘gambling’; I will constantly  endeavor  to remove  the ‘pain’, of my suffering  Brethearen; I will not support any religious,caste or language  ‘differentiation’;  I will  

                       be honest  and endeavor  to make a ‘corruption free’ society;  I will for become an  ‘enlightened citizen and  make my family  ‘righteous’; I will always  be a friend of the mentally and physically challenged, and I work  hard (never be lazy) to make  them  feel, ‘Normal’, like the rest  of us; will be proudly  celebrate  the Success of  

                       ‘My Country’ and ‘My people’.’    

 

‘The (29 year old Saudi Arabian) prince (King Salman) has kept his distance from the Council of Senior Scholars, the mostly elderly clerics who set official religious policy and often release religious opinions that young Saudis mock as being out of touch with modern life’ reported in Economic Times of 17th October need to be read in , when any policies need to be framed.

 

India cannot afford any more ‘spend thrift’(prodigal type) activities of the government of India, by going on increasing  civil servants ‘salaries’, remuneration by succeeding Pay commissions,(and the like…)  as even ‘very rich countries like Saudi Arabia is applying stricter( brakes ) control on civil servants’ (pay outs), Inda also need to take note on.in the like manner.  Else you just ‘debase’ your rupee value ; what kind of Economic growth you talk about is the question comes out of every citizen’s mouth in India.

 

One needs to note, that the State  of Maharashtra Mr. Kapil Patil ,MLC of ‘ Lok Bharathi party’ raised an issue on MLA’s  on MLC’s salary increase Bill before the Council,  since increase in salaries is effective from August 2016,( to be effected by a Bill) that is before the Legislative Council says:

 

                            ‘..about 3.5 lakh crore loan is being faced …’ by the government of  

                                                            Maharashtra   

                          That loan is being serviced by Rs.28,000 crore interest per annum’

 

What it speaks about?

 

He also adds, that the ‘Law makers have to serve the people of the state , not to make money’ ;

 

One needs to know , from which funds the State is paying 28,000 crores by way of interest.

 

Obviously that burden is landing on tax payers of Maharashtra, by way of ‘indirect state taxes’ , being levied, is it not, readers?

 

How 3,5 lakh crores loan is saddled on the state, ne needs to know, if published in the public domain, one will come to know , what are the people centred projects directly benefitting the state people? And what are not that useful in the short run and in long run need to be assessed;

 

if assessed, the law makers hitherto before the present government, how much moneys ‘rightly used’ for the direct benefit for the whole state people directly, what are misused one can assess.

 

So it is high time, CAG, state Accountant  Generla need to report and post the same on the ‘public domain’, then ‘cat will be out of the bag.

 

How tax administration, supposed to be beneficial for the citizens of the very state one can assess, is it not?

 

In that way , one can assess the direct taxes levied in state of Maharashtra by way of ‘Income Taxes’ is used by the Nation and how much moneys are paid to the State from that kitty will be out.

 

One needs to assess, why tax payers are to be ‘taxed’ for wasted funds, on so called ‘freebees’ reservations, and all kinds of largesse  one can quantify why very CAG can report to the people, will be the big question;

why the very Constitutional Courts cannot by ‘Suo motu’ recognize, and question the relevant governments is another question before the very citizens of India, on behalf of the citizens very CAG can answer the questions besides the ministry of finance of relevant states as also by the union government is public view of people of India under the very Art 265 r/w Art 14 r/w Art 226 and Art 32 for ‘judicial review’  .

 

Even GST itself is a big controversial issue, as it also needs additional ‘cess’, that information is available in the GST conference of Union and States meet which is on now .

 

Simple pontification type lectures by any cannot satisfy any individual citizen as he definitely has his own ‘individual rights under very fundamental rights, as is asserted by very PM Mr. Narendra Modi;

 

Whatever individual rights PM enjoys as a citizen is equally applicable to every citizen right up to a street beggar, as long as he or she is a citizen under Art 5 of the very Constitution of India, is it not?

 

We all know what Mr Gopal Subramaniam as an Amicus curie rightly submitted on the BCCI matter the other day, ‘BCCI committed serious contempt of the court, when it is playing hide and seek on ‘Lodha panel recommendations, by not strictly following honorable Apex court Orders, ‘BCCI shall implement the Lodha Panel recommendations’; when BCCI avoids, he suggested to the honorable court, ‘just dismiss the BCCI as also state boards and appoint Administrators, to handle the administration of all cricket boards in India and once the Administrators boards rightly implemented the Lodha panel recommendations which recommendation obviously ‘Not Governments’ interference’ but Apex Court Orders valid for the Country as Judiciary is independent of any, Government, obviously asserted when it declared ‘ultra vires’ the very NJAC Act and the relevant Constitutional amendment.

 

One can note as well the very court in Madras  Bar Association v National Tax Tribunal matter , just declared the very Act is again ‘ultra vires’ for reasons stated therein.

 

Obviously , Any court orders cannot be treated as ‘Government Orders or so called ‘government interference at all, after all every government cannot survive more than than 5 years since governments are formed by elected representatives is again obvious, is it not?   

 

Therefore when the so called BCCI is not able to understand the difference of the court order and the government interference, it is obvious Mr Gopal Subramaniam rightly suggested for dismissal of these so called ‘Cricket Boards’ as these boards so far acted ‘arbitrarily ‘ is again very obvious. These boars misused ‘public funds’ is again obvious; indeed, committed ‘serious breach of trusts’  Act and violated very Society registration Acts, so obviously, these trusts can be summarily dismissed and the relevant boards ‘directors’ brought to justice, as most of the directors, behaved like Mr. Trump of the USA where he is contesting President election, once election is over there the new president at the ‘white house’ would order ‘arrest of Mr Trump if he is not elected as the president of the USA, obviously USA citizens cannot be taken for granted like Indian citizens are taken for granted. Any wrong doers would be brought to justice, justice no where is the government domain, but it the National perception of the people so they keep the judiciary obviously separate from any governments why even the legislatures   any where  is any where is accepted Judicial theory.

 

So, the Taxation funds  if are misused by any , that Authority need to be liable to be brought before justice , None can deny, is it not?

 

That way , I discuss further here the Justice Mr  Gopal Gowda’s  lecture he delivered some where and reported in a taxation journal (s) recently, below:

  1. Good college type lecture indeed by Justice Mr Gowda of honorable Supreme court, in some lecture he gave in some place.. .
  2. Normally ‘Leaders’ are like ‘Dr APJ Abdul Kalam’;
  3. Leader normally  is one ‘who like  the ‘one’ climbs the ‘tallest tree’, surveys  the entire situation, and yells , ‘Wrong Jungle’;
  4. Manager is one who like the ‘one’ who  who is a ‘producer, or a Manager often respond…’Shut up’! We are  ‘Making Progress’
  5. Governance is like a leadership , needs to be careful not to be in the ‘Wrong Jungle’; only right ‘leader’ can be the one to govern a state; that is what every voter who gives vote to him, one needs to realize.
  6. Lectures mostly are some kind of pontification – not achievable paradigms or principles like the Finance Acts, an every year ‘ritual’, which is ‘managed ‘ by the ‘public servants’  like managers;

 

  1. Managers try to achieve those ‘thoughts’ rightly and speedily’, Like that kind Managers are the Ministers as also MPs or MLAs.

 

  1. But the Finance Acts are equally some ‘management thought only, basically to corner ‘some huge tax funds through ‘Taxation’ , talking some ‘unachievable ideas as objectives’, indeed is  very ‘costly’ effort on taxpaying public’;

 

  1. Mostly many ‘objectives’ remain as ‘unfinished objects’ as ever, as ‘some unfinished projects’ are – Highways, jobs, Employments (How you will generate more and more Jobs, when the ‘Artificial intelligence’ takes over, year over year (YOY), is reducing the number of employees, under one pretext or some ‘ploys’, after all, it is a easily known  fact;

 

    1. – when ‘mechanisation’ takes over progressively mostly in a ‘geometrical way’, while man power can ‘Arithmetically  progressively develop things better; obviously;
    2. ‘Man power cannot over take Machine power’;
    3. that way textile workers/labor, lost their jobs to ‘machine driven’ spindles,looms etc; (Obviously you, as politicians cheat the people, progressively!, that cannot go forever), every reasonable person says.
  1. He says taxation is some ‘ Management based idea’ only; So it is obviously practiced today as a ‘management’ tool, by politicians as political business men;

.

  1. Management means, ‘Doing things rightly’. is accepted view all over the world..
  2. Without people, no government can generate any ‘resource’ anywhere:
  3. Therefore, Americans say,in crystal clear terms, ‘Don’t depend on governments; but you ought to depend on you, only.
  4. Why Indians don’t understand?.
  5. Any ‘rag picker’ (Never depends on any government but on Rubbish bins/dust bins on roads; like any Manager does; so also some ‘roads or public grounds’ do provide food);
  6. ‘Does the management’ of his food and roof, are being handled by him like a Manager does;
  7. as he gets what he needs at any dust or rubbish bins or set of dust bins, strewn on the roads.

 

  1. He does real ‘physical management’, without wasting his time in some MBA college/schools.

 

  1. But well to do does,thinking some more ‘arts’ to know how to cheat fellow businesses or fellow people, as also now misuse HRD ideas of so called ‘cost cutting’ (reducing man power), by obviously ‘wasting ‘time and money’ in some college/schools, for his ‘so called recognized’ MBA degrees (mean nothing);
  2. MBA degree never teaches any real ‘Leadership skills’, is very obvious great fact;
  3. Leadership is based on some ‘Philosophy of some ‘policy’, individually developed ‘perspectives;
  4. Government without sensible ‘Leadership skill based policy’; obviously any ‘governance’ is no better than ‘rag pickers’ paradise’ only.
  5. That way ‘Taxation ‘ is today.
  6. Therefore ‘Nothing Great great about ‘Taxation’ but politicians really rob the people one way or the other’.
  7. Government wastes just ‘Tax payers funds’ like a rag picker throws away what is not needed from ‘dust bin’, once rag picker uses what he needed; but tax payer indeed cannot throw away his hard earned moneys, like one throws one’s waste items , waste is the owner doesn’t need that ‘stuff’;
  8. Tax is a  proved ‘free money’, (like in dust bins the material is not bought)  the Government earns by so called ‘Authoritative Tax policies’, under so called ‘Taxation legislations, and rules framed time and again, every year, year over year basis; and gets enforced on Tax payers arbitrarily.
  9. You could have seen in a case Dr… Gautam Sen………v/s CIT, the CCIT issues how sec 158 Notice, is misused by CCIIT, ‘as if’, his AO found ‘unaccounted cash’; and  he forced the tax payer to pay the ‘ court fees revenue need  to incur’ ; the CCIT wanted to pocket that ‘much money;
  10. But the Bombay High Court found out the ‘Revenue never accused in its report’  that the tax payer,had no ‘unaccounted money’;
  11. But the CCIT manipulated that the tax payer had ‘unaccounted cash money’ in his possession ;
  12. so the Court recently levied fine on CCIT, as CCIT  obviously wanted to pocket the court litigation expenses (fees) or other expenses , the CCIT wanted to get from the very tax payer – what you call ?,
  13. Do you call that ‘ the CCIT, is better than a ‘Beggar’ resorting to looting the man on the high way, as if it is his right to loot the ‘man on the street’ ;
  14. as he did not carry enough cash to appease the ‘beggar’: in fact Governments taxations resort that kind or ‘robbs’;
  15. so these ‘taxes’ are  more or less similar kind great ‘Arbitrary Management practices’ only , certainly any one would agree;
  16. ‘Governments under so called ‘Taxation’ tries to wipe out any tax payers’ savings under the so called ‘Taxation ‘ laws and rules arbitrarily’ framed,;
  17. just to, illegally pocket the tax payers funds, for the MPs or MLAs arbitrary hikes in their salaries and perquisites do qualify;
  18. besides, the so called ‘exemptions’ given to corporate and ‘freebies’ given  to some ‘voters’ (who never understand mostly);
  19. obviously some great ‘big leaks’ they are (freebees) on the ‘tax payers funds’ only.
  20. As a result, do we not realize, how the so called ‘Taxation’ is  all about;
  21. What are for purposes?.
  22. We can’t pontify that tax funds via ;Taxation ‘ is a ‘great public use purpose’ idea only;
  23. Most tax funds  taken from the tax payers obviously is to promote illegal trafficking of tax funds in all kinds of ‘prodigal activities’  of so called governments;

 

  1. which uses some so called ‘laws’ or ‘rules’, which are dutifully managed through the tax courts, saying ‘you shall abide  by the so called ‘tax laws’ and rules again some so called ‘procedural laws’;
  2. you call these ‘rules’ as the so called ‘legislative intent’  and so on’, you interpret by the so called ‘taxation jurisprudence’ unknowingly what you dispense as justice;
  3. This kind of effort only invited the ‘French Revolution’ in the 14th century France , wherein King Louis IV of France and his queen as also so called ‘law makers’  suffered ‘Bastile prison sentences’ ;
  4. Many imcluding the King and Nobles were beheaded in the cold blood by Robert Spiere court in France; He was himself a public spirited man in France then;
  5. , you may  ‘recall’ at France; and you all might recollect;
  6. Any ‘arbitrary taxing’ would invite peoples wrath every one needs to know;
  7. Courts cannot just ‘pontificate’; then courts too face peoples’ wrath, earlier realized it is better, is my humble submission as my ‘considered view’;

 

  1. We all know Constitution of India is obviously a ‘Leadership thought of the Country’ – ie obviously, ‘Doing the things Rightly’ Not ‘doing things rightly , one needs to know.
  2. You just can’t pontificate, as if ‘Taxation management’ is great;

 

  1. so in the USA, then it was said ‘No taxation without representation’, idea surfaced, if you recall you may recollect what is the ‘emphasis;
  2. You might have seen what ‘Mr. Donald Trump’ said about ‘USA Taxation’ ;
  3. and with that ‘ploy’ he drove ‘home’ , his 18 years ‘Not payng taxes’ as he cheated obviously for the benefit of not being ‘exploited’, indeed he exploited as well by avoiding the ‘Taxation’ ;
  4. True many want to cheat the reasonable taxation so a lot of followers emerged as of now, there ;– but for his ‘lewd comments or remarks on US women voters’, obviously he misused;
  5. he could have been a great ‘Republican Nominee’ , by ‘default’, to win ‘president nomination from his party’;
  6. his ‘indiscretion’ on ‘women’ and ‘avoidance of taxes have really been costing like an Albatross on his ‘election to white house’, he might face; every reader needs to know;
  7. ‘Law of Contracts’ is a badly misused mechanism :
  8. as ‘No Contract is legitimately drawn is obvious,
  9. if you appreciate the Nobel winning ‘Contract Theory’ which is no longer a just some ‘theory’, but straight away to be used, to test on its anvil, every contract of any kind in the world; that would obviously show, hw many ‘breaches’ are there in every contract;
  10. So American Constitution realized so it is just some 18 pages document only and not running in 1000s of pages;
  11. How indian ‘Law makers’ misread, to elaborate without so much nessary fetters on the future politicians in using  the ‘Indian Constitution, by so called misreadings;

 

  1. like it all started from day one of the Constitution  misread  that ,came into operation, under the so called ‘First Constitutional Amendment’ which accomodated the so called ‘Sch IVA ‘;
  2. which tried to bar the courts ‘to ensure not to interfere with statutes’ passed by the law makers;
  3. when they tried to ensure that the courts can’t interfere their so called ‘great thoughts’ by way of ‘statutes’ ;
  4. such kind of ‘qualifying statutes or rules’ that are inserted in the so called, ‘Finance Bills’ every year found in the parliament or legislatures, is it not?
  5. When courts under the  so called ideal of ‘judicial restraint ’
  6. don’t question the veracity of any tax statute,  but simply give a judical approval to such ‘oddities’ by way of H C or S C judgements; even then ‘there were so many lacunaes they did find like in the H C judgement I quoted above, item 6 above.   

 

  1. This is the reflection of the  view of Peter Drucker and Warren Bennis, any serious ‘professor of ‘Taxation Economics’ have to ‘assess’ and need to know; else he is bound to guide his students ‘wrongly.

 

  1. Obviously today students of Taxation Economics are confused, as they are not rightly guided , like ‘doing like right things’;

 

  1. Indeed, professor has to be a ‘right leader’ in a class not as a so called ‘Manager’, like any Management Graduate holding some MMS or MBA degrees.

 

  1. These managers with management degrees just do what management expects , ie ‘ doing things rightly’;
  2. Obviously ‘ ‘things are told by Boards, (like BCCI did) may be like a ‘leader’  but just ‘a managing’ art.

 

  1. Today so called ‘Public servants’  mostly behave like so called ‘MBA /MMS graduates do in any ‘company’, by simply calling themselves as if some ‘so called’ great professionals ;
  2. These so called ‘public servants’ (like CITs), behave like  ‘managers in the companies’ – like ‘Enron’ (USA) that  is the governments  are  today.
  3. And such companies , the PSUs of governments,(many just have temerity not to follow SC judgements even in pensions as they  use some great ‘Anderson Consulting’  as is found ‘in the so called CAs  and Advocates’ who partake as some ‘partners in progress’, with the Political Enrons ie is your governments, we boast of;
  4. Anyway ‘you feel great’ to be a citizen function under such  institutions,that is what Indian Independence ultimately has ended in a matter of about seven decades.

 

  1. If the Boards of management tell things called ‘directions’’, like the ‘Managers’ do ; obviously . they will just do like Managers only, means ‘plenty of drawbacks ‘ one can visualize, if any real leader observes.

 

  1. In the past say about 4 or 5 decades before professors were teaching like ‘Leaders’ do;

 

 

  • So they were the ‘great teachers’; but today professors obviously behave like ‘ managers do’ ;

 

 

  1. So obviously they are not respected by the very students;
  2. that kind you can see in very Karnataka universities, like Bangalore university, where teachers (professors) are threatened, which Mr Gowda himself knows.
  3. Incidentally i was a UGC resource professor taught in the Bangalore university for about 2 years 2007-2008, then I could meet a lot of university teachers coming as ‘staff’  for training. They told with tears.
  4. in my next comment , i will explain why taxation system in india is failing. tk

 

  1. ‘Taxes are mainly used to finance the expenses incurred by Government to manage an economy.
  2. These expenses include as well: ‘health care, education, transportation and operating Government business entities etc.

 

  1. Taxation is also used by Government for several other purposes such as—..’, is stated by the justice Mr. Gopal Gowda;

 

  1. In one of ‘my comment ‘, based lectures on Art 311 at the Parliamentary training institute, held in ‘Capital Hotel’, organised by the Karnataka legislative department, in 2007, at the ‘request –a  kind suggestion’ of Justice (retd) Mr. Venkatramaiah then, I recall.
  2. In that seminar type many MLAs of Karnataka, besides retd justices of SC as also Karnataka high court attended, as i then, visited Bangalore from Bombay due to my wife’s operation in November 2006, and I had to be there till middle 2008, shutul between Bombay . Bangalore, Bombay, Bangalore, as I am an Advocate of Bombay high court on (Original side), and that way I attended Karnataka high court in some matters as a counsel too.
  3. We all know the ‘today’s Contracts, as is understood today is obviously lacking real teeth, so a lot of problems  in very Contracts too’;
  4. So ‘contracts’ basically are not to be regarded as ‘right’ rounded contract as such, that leads to breaches on and off;
  5. See the very Constitution of India ‘is a rule of law’, based contract document, like ‘Magna Carta’ type of India’ peoples’ contract as framed by the well meaning Constituent Assembly,
  6. Most Indian governments ever so many times obviously treated ‘ fundamental rights'(opted and adopted from Irish Constitution) is’ taken for granted’, when the government in the First constitutional Amendment introduced Sch IXA, to bar the courts in some statutes, that way initial few statutes went on bulging, till 2007;
  7. When in Jan 2007, the CJI Mr YK Sabharwal correctly handled the LR Coelho v St of (Madras) TN, case;
  8. in that constitutional court he simply and rightly declared ‘sch IX’  violated the Indian constitution ;
  9. so declared that sch IX as ‘ultra vires’ ; but in the interest of ensuring to control confusion, he allowed some first few 13 or so statutes brought into the said Sch, is permitted to continue as also one CJI K.Subba Rao in the imp case constitutional bench matter. All of you know.
  10. Recent Nobel Prize won on a ‘Contract theory’ (2016) is directly applicable on any contract, all over the world, as no ‘Contract’ is rightly constructed, some serious deficiencies can be found in every great contract, if rightly studied and evaluated and assessed.
  11. Your great taxation is also based on ‘ill constructed contacts’.
  12. That can be discussed tested on the anvil of the very Indian Constitution r/w the ‘Contract theory’ now envisioned in the Nobel Prize for Economics;

 

  1. In fact, Indian Taxation system ‘does not have any sensible reasoning today’ is very obvious;
  2. most of the tax revenue is just diverted to some ‘freebees’ by politicians, some meaningless ‘exemptions’ to corporates,  and to some rich and wealthy.

 

  1. Kaldor theory is not yet properly understood by successive governments; as the governments had some things  need to grind their axe, (to grind their axe, in favor of politicians), that way our great ‘black moneys’ surged;
  2. duly  cooperating Accounting and legal community duly assisted the building up of the black money, obviously because of political patronage for wrong ends.

 

  1. But politicians played in the ‘black moneys’ idea some great ‘new leverages’, and ‘duly misusing’ ‘innocence’ of poor common (Man) citizens; who are always just screwed up ‘by politicians ploys’, like ‘rapists’, who try to handle their victims, and while, they try to get escaped, besides misusing ‘anticipatory bails’ provisions, duly supported by ‘prosecuting authorities’, who are given ‘great’ benefits ‘that way’ we misuse laws or /and statutes, as a result, ‘unconsciously’.

 

  1. See how recent judgement in Meena case on sec 468a in divorce cases is ‘misinterpreted’ by very great Apex court, recently; simply be misused, the ‘goodness of the judges’, who delivered that judgement on the so called ‘term’ ‘cruelty’ of parents;
  2. Obviously it really said in clear terms, ‘brides’ have to live in the groom’s house, obviously the bride has to walk into matrimony house and to live with groom’s parents ‘under any conditions’ can be interpreted;
  3. while groom need not to stay in bride’s parent’s house -obvious Art 14, 15 and Art 21 are just misinterpreted or allowed to get ‘manipulated’.

 

  1. It says ‘ under Art 5, ‘woman’(brides) too are  citizens like the men.

 

  1. Naturally meaningful position would be, under sound reasoning one needs to reason out, that the couple have to live in their own new house where the bride and groom need to stay alone;

 

  1. so that neither parents are to directly get affected nor they could affect the bride or the groom;

 

  1. if some problems do arise to parents or if parents face naturally, the parents ‘need to be maintained at the levels’, the bride or groom lives, under very sec 125 of Cr.P.C ;

 

  1. it is not to be ‘the concern of the court’, whether the couple have enough economic competence or ‘muscle’,  to sustain the expenses, like the court is not concerned with the state’s revenue when the judgement is delivered, same rule  need  to apply here too;

 

  1. i do not understand why judges indulge in areas not to be concerned.

 

  1. If judges are practical the so called false ‘cruelty’ idea cannot or may not surface; then judicial discipline is to be really just balanced. Nothing more Nothing Less;

 

  1. You cannot send any one to prison for it affects one’s dignity;

 

  1. if false complaints allow the illegal imprisoning a person is needed to be visited by exemplary ‘liquidated damages’ on the one who is responsible including the policemen that way the deterrence could be there, why we are not impartial;

 

  1. Just because ‘greed’( today value is too much attracted for some wealth as such)(in fact wealth comes and goes so it is like some myopic perception only) rules the mind of perpetrators; obviously they need to be taken on  by the rule of law,…is my considered view as well.
  2. …I therefore, obviously say that very Taxation Economics (again a myopia) we need to understand and  need to be re-written, lest we make serious mistakes in the so called idea of judicial restraints that bedevil the ‘Judiciary; today,
  3. I understand from media reported, that taxpayers funds in exchequer is practically misused by retired public servants, if that were so why there need to be perennial taxes, any fool might question? (Ends)

 

I agree with his idea: ( I mean one justice Mr Agarwal of Supreme court) when he said ‘simplify tax laws’ will it be possible is my question under my arguments as noted below.

‘Much of litigations arise because of myriad exemption and deductions. If these are given a go-by and instead very low rates of taxes in direct taxation statutes introduced, there may hardly arise any controversy between the revenue and taxpayers’.

In fact the fiscal administration is indeed highly confused, more so every year some new ideas or some wrong ideas, or some ‘political advantageous ideas’ and the like when surfacing, the fiscal administration gets ‘over confused’ after all finance minister will not agree with earlier finance minister under so called ‘public new policy floated by the political party in the power’ mainly because ‘one upmanship’ the new government wants to bring in, like ‘123 agreement’ by UPA, and now ‘GST’ by the BJP in power, for example.

such ‘rigmaroles’ UPA failed to appreciate ‘ radio activity menace in nuclear power plants to be put, with the world experiences like – in the very USA, Germany, and Japan say a plenty on the ‘radio activity’ and in fact this if we need the Nuclear power plants in the name of ‘clean energy’ – liability of the Nation by way loans from world organisations running for decades on the national exchequer, is again charged on ‘Taxation’ ideas, that burden is straight transfered on ‘tax payers’, under so called fiscal policies, besides ‘monetary policies ‘ are charged – that means monetary policies run for ‘helicopter moneys’ plans sure method of reaching ‘inflations’ to ‘stagflation and so on is contributed by the so called fiscal policies in the name of OWH idea, ‘i buy civilization’ and the like so also ‘internet ‘ and so on.

In the similar way, we have ‘infrastructure developments’ like national high ways authority planning and constructing ‘high ways’ (not anyway comparable to Turnpikes of the USA, (we have to carry on major repairs, even during the construction of high ways due to sub standard works encouraged by politicians in power for ‘obvious reasons’ (tax payer has to carry the burden to meet such nefarious obligations, like the 2G scams and other scams too , normally every government is involved to appease the politicians in power, (again the taxpayer bears the burdens incessantly every year under new garbs, that also gets into so called ‘fiscal plans’ promoted and expressed in budgets like the one mainly here ‘annual; budgets.

similarly , the examples are galore…

Obviously, uncontrollably diverted funds are met by tax payers – both direct and indirect – that obviously increases very big disparity between two classes – so called ‘rice’ and ‘wealthy’ and the really poor people; while ‘poor people’ number surges year after year (yoy), but politicians project they have done great things they had done they would do if re-elected to power also charges ‘taxation’ – see Mr. Trump obviously didn’t pay taxes quite many years in the USA, today on a Republican ticket says, ‘ he would do great things; likewise our indian politicians too; USA can afford the luxury but India cannot, our legal Acts just support these ‘untrustworthies’ in the guise of governments under so called ‘fiscal policies’ those fiscal policies are supported by the statutes like taxation laws, rules framed by very perpetrators, as so called ‘law makers’; (when in trouble the very so called ‘perpetrators in the guise of law makers, during the UPA rule tried to ensure that the constitutional courts cannot try those law makers, thank God that law could not get passed, if passed, our constitutional courts would under so called ‘judicial restraint’ would have been passing order in favor of such so called statutes, as the hon constitutional courts would shy to handle ‘judicial review on such ‘untenable acts or statutes’, (that way only the so called schedule IX surfaced in the form of very first amendment to the constitution) (obviously the politicians in 1950s too indulged in such ‘theatrics’).

Therefore the taxation and laws have become more and more complicated, due to so called ‘judicial restraint’ ideas, (obviously a great support to the perpetrators of all wrongs in the garb of law makers, who got elected by clear defraud on the voters conscience , by so called free bees ideas, but that also survived, but the burden is again on all tax payers both direct and indirect taxes.

So things went on complicated, year over year by so called ‘fiscal budgets’ and the complications surfaced in the forms of sections in so many laws created by so called ‘law makers’, in a ‘gungho’ fashions’ year over year; in fact ‘law became a misused too in the hands of the so called law makers, in fact these law makers just shamelessly caused the breach of contract to the constitutional obligations to the ‘dejure’ citizens whose Art 5 position is just taken for granted, when the very fundamental rights got abridged drastically when Art 13 was drastically abridged by so called Constitutional amendments that way Constitutional amendments, getting some kind of constitution identity.. that way so many amendments surfaced.

can the courts say how they consciously permitted such ‘constitutional amendments’ ; certainly cannot, so they too face the problems day by day like the so called, NJAC Act, thank God , rightly anyway , rightly questioned and rightly declared ‘ultra vires’ by a sensible constitutional bench.

therefore, our taxation policy is made ever cumbersome year over year; CAs act as per those in fact ‘illegal’ statutes , besides other statutes, so too our Advocacy community,

Nothing is so easy is the fact whence you bow to obvious lawmakers turned ‘perpetrators’ so long as the citizens really take on them directly, like some ‘recall’ or ‘referendum’ but these perpetrators would not allow ‘recalls’ or ‘referendums’ some tome to come; unless some Robertsperres surface.

Macaulay rightly said, india indeed a rich country there poverty cannot interfere unless ‘we as British bring in our system of laws ‘so that we can cow down these ‘Indians.

See Bhutan govt is opening ‘law colleges’ obviously, not allowing the british indian system of laws, but mostly every thing would get based on mediation and conciliation ‘, a time tested method of running a state.

Things in India is complicated by so called law makers.

 

What is ‘Gyana -shakthi’ (Knowledge based on Wisdom) and ‘Kriya shakhthi’ (actions based on Wisdom)

By  Prof. (Acharya). Dr. Guru Balakrishnan. PhD M.L

Gyana (Jnana) -Shakti (Knowledge based Wisdom)  and on ‘Kriya-Shakthi’ (Knowlege based action of Man) (so too of Animals and all amphibians). Every living creature is itself a ‘Creator’himself or herself like very God.

How?

Gynana shakthi is called (Medha = Wisdom based knowledge);

Kriya shakthi is called a ‘ Tapas ‘ based ;

Obviously, ‘Manusha’ = Humans (Men)  includes all Animal world, as Man several times behaves like ‘ignorant person’.

Examples:

(just illustrative only and you can add many depending on your own life experieces, that can be some of your own ‘Upanishadic thoughts’, so any one can write from his or her real life experiences can objectively write the thoughts, by just being impartial observers, then in Aranya vasam , living in forests as a single person, once one spouse dies or one takes to ‘sanyasa’ (mostly people choose to walk out of his famiy) l(leaving all properties and all that he held close to his chest) and the one chooses  to live all alone without any assistance  – else spouses will be ‘selfish’(indeed true, you see why you people get things for your grand children and their children, you can realise) is the basic concept )

Root cause of all trouble is ‘Desire for wealth or anything in material form. So In Aranya ashram, he just despices all’ material form wealth, is the paradigm propagated by this last ‘dharma’ called ‘Aranyam’.

This material wealth problem has caught in every part of the universes. So Stephen Hawkins recently said in his research reveals some more powerful  beings are likely to reach this earth, as we (men) unnecessarily contacting them, that will be [perhaps the end of this ‘human’s civilization, jst because those beings just could vanquish man- humans just in ‘No time’ frame, it is stated in the latest research…yes, ‘we started internet, that would extend their reach on us – Humans, it is believed – what is once acceptable would soon turn into very bad proposition.

We have an experience in Nuclear power, of what happened in Hiroshima, Nagasaki in Japan in 1946, or in Chernobyl (Ukraine) (Russia) (USSR), in the 1980s (now it is said it would take about 1000 years to rever the position of very Chernobyl as a township as then on;y some people or kiving beings may/ can survive as is presumed now;

In 2004, we experienced ‘Tsunami’ due to underground earthquakes in Aceh (Java)(indonesia). That took a toll about a lac of people in the area covering the Indian ocean, like Sri Lanka,Taiwan, Malasia, some parts of Australia (North zones) , India, and so on…

so also in Bhopal Union Carbide ‘Isocynate’ explosion which just killed about 20,000 persons and a lot many disabled in various ways;

We saw in Fakushima (Japan) in 2011 or 2012, in Dai- chi thermal power plant explosions, due to flooding the reactors just gave in deadly radiation.

Fact is any ‘advancement ‘  materially has a lot of consequences is a great facr, after all any material desire in bound to have its side bad effects too is again and again confirmed by natural events , like Plateu plates in india and other countries relevant to the plateau got affected and seriously suffered, due to Tsunami caused  by earthquake in 2004.

Therefore, how well the Upanishads reveal the facts  is no exaggeration. Nature adjusts to new series of effects naturally besides by ‘Man made ‘ disaters one can visualize.

Again see, how valid is the Upanshad on Janashakti (Wisdom based knowledge). See below somw illustrative examples:

Recently in the State of U P,  at  or near Bhulandshar, some high way rapist  

            cum robbers, attacked a  car and forcibly stopped the car and  robbed and  

            pulled out females from it, and took them to some secluded place and gang  

            Raped the women  – a teacher and her teen aged daughter and left them    

           There and escaped; the attacked  family walked the distance to a near by  

           police station; and lodged their FIR on the irreconcilable event on the high  

           way – obviously due to  non presence  (absence) of High way police in the    

           Zone‘ –  instead of the State taking liability and responsibility and

           accountability to that family as also to India citizens, as also wporld  

           community – its State  Minister one Mr. Azam Khan tries to say ‘ robbing and     

           rape ‘ perpetrated by  the llocal  opposition politicians to ptove the exis ‘so   

           called’ ,   ‘S P (Samaj ( = Society protector) wadi),  party) in power try to bask  

                                     in  its own glory, simply to clean itts very  dirty linen,  used that man in Azam  

                                     Khan to say so, obviously hurting the sentiments of the family which rightly    

                                      asked for the trial in some other state other than  the UP (obviously for want of

                                     ts confidence on the government in power in the U P);

Remarks:

It is indeed on the part of the State or Azam Khab obviously not a  

wisdom based knowledge (Gyana); but some ‘useless Knowledge)  

that resuted, ‘ blasphemous statements by the Stae under non

wisdom based (Kriya shakti) action of the state concerned; while the  

affected family rughtly used its wisdom based knowledge ( Gyana

shakti) to request the court to transfer the case to the state other than

in the UP fearing ‘ justice is not possible’ to be obtained as trial

courts work under tge very obvious ‘failed’ state and such action falls

under ( ‘Kriya shakthy’ – wisdom based action)

One can read here why the rule of law is there saying when

one complainant moves a court not confident to get right justice at the place that person can request the very local trial cpurt or rthe very high court to transfer its case in the interest of ‘Justice’ ( very pribnciple of justice is Justice is done , and the justice seemed to have been done)

  

Similarly, ‘Uri’ attack, recently, in Kashmir where ‘ Indian soldiers’ in the tent    

            sleeping,  unarmed were mercilessly shot dead by very Pakistan Soldiers –   

            obviously  such kind of action by any military force is not treated as any  

            glorious Military act (  Yuddha -dharma – gyana shakthi followed time   

            immemorial). ( such ideas are based upon Gyana shakti time immemorial)   

            and any such ‘actions following ‘gyana shakthi’  is called right Kriya shakti   

            Doctrine;

Another example:

I am given to understand in the state of Mharashtra, ‘Marati teachers’ are being removed as ‘Marati medium is not accepted as the pupils do not take to ‘Marati Medium’, just because ‘pupils parents want ‘ English medium schools, tha means government cannot remove ‘Marati medium teachers’ at all as that Marati medium was basically promoted by the very State, and started such teacher education programs, depending  on the program several persons chose to do as local government wanted vernacular schools to be promooted; it was not the folly of the marati medium teachers, ‘they too to Marati medium courses and then got trainedt  as  some chose to become vernacular teachers,

(but for the teachers how will the local governments can run marati (vernacular) medium schools; so it is obvious the government cannot remove marati medium teachers , but obviously  ought to maintain them even pupils strength falls as pupils choose  English Medium  ( That is Gyana shakthi  with right Kriya Shaki  – meaning Wisdom);(In the alternative provide them full pensionary benefits and thus retire them – you cannot discharge them without benefits , so that there will be some credibility of government is possible.) Obviously , the Marati medium teachers can form an association , and move the Bombay High Court under Art 226 r/w 227 r/w Art 14, Art 51A, Art 300A (property) citing the case L A Chandrakumar vs UOI case, to ensure them some livelihood relevant to their qualifications or retire them with ‘notional’ service benefiits counting their ‘future- Notional service’ as teachers , with the last pay drawn basis their pensions need to be calculated, so that they need not be on roads and need not ‘commit suicides’ as they are likely to due non availability of jobs in private sector , if not need be absorbed as ‘junior clerks with their last drawn salaries protected, in regular government offices where ‘marati ‘ as lingua franca is used; or use them as ‘translators’ into Marati from English or viceversa, by duky training them in the ‘in house training schools’ that is called (gyana shakthi);( Affected teachers can take to court for redress, that way the hon  Courts today use Judicial reviews as a Gyana-shakthy.(If needed the relevant groups of teachers can get my free legal advice, if approached) (ANY WAY I am posting here*  a specimen – Writ Draft (you can use to your relative circumstances, on *Face Book on my Time Line (you can open my account –

Same thing happened, in Andhra Pradesh, some decades back at Hyderabad, what then A P Government did.  ‘  A P government (then) retained the ‘Telugu medium teachers’, till their term of service was over, and bestowed on them ‘relevant pensionary benefits’; (Such action by State is to be treated ‘ Governance by a government in place. That is called ‘ Gyana -shakti followed by Kriya -shakthy; – Such ideas were perceived time immemorial).

If Humans behave like Sri Ram or Lord Krishna, or Lord Buddha,  Yudhishtra, Vyasa, Vashista, Valmiki, Lord Jesus Moses, Zoraster, Seer Tiruvalluvar , Avvayyar and the like, any Pope (at Rome), Mohammed, Bhakthi Vedanta of ISCON, Shankara, Ramanuja, Annamacharya, Lata Mangeshkar, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Albert Einstein, Newton, Mahatama Gandhi, Dr. Nelson  Mandela, and like, many others whom you call them as ‘Evolved Persons, (Gyanis – Wisdom based knowledge evolved)    (Medha(vis))(men of high order wisdom).

When such persons perform their actions called Kriya shakti then it is called Wisdom based actions.

If men like  Ravana, Hiranyaksha, Hiranya Kaspu, Duryodhana, later forms in Hitler, Mussolini, Chengez Khan, Osama bin Laden, all kinds of ‘terrorists’ ;and their kind (called as ‘devils; rapists and murderers as smaller devils types) when they perform , they generally perform , ordinary knowledge based actions. They also have ‘some  unendurable knowledge’ and perform persistently their own actions sans Wisdom.

(These kinds  said in 2nd category would  definitely corner everything for them is the critera.)

The issue of thought is , you like to have everything in exclusion of others – fellow beings, is the paradigm.

Similarly, today’s youth (as ill-educated by selfishness based education) are not inclined to be  duty bound;

unlike what  seer Truvakkuvar said types – ‘sons and the like if do things greatly exemplary’ would be treated as real meaningful progeny to speard their family names.

World has the second quality or type, in the greatest number possible due to wrong set of thoughts generated in the young age (like pasumarathil adittha aani pol = like a nail is driven in a live green tree),;

while the former type (wisdom based children) is in the least number; therefore , creations and destructions speed increases in an accellerated moves, that way they create more  and more ‘pralayas’ ‘destructions, or called (mentally paralysed persons;

like most of the modern politicians who look for their personal benefits forgetting their duty to their voters as also the citizens once elected to office; besides many of public servants do fall in this category, one may clearly decipher, all over the human race  world over.

Very concept of ‘Mausha’ quality (tanmai ) has lost its track.  Manusham means ‘justb human’. Do we find such humans in great number? Obviously NO, just because , our lop educated education is thev cause, education sans morality and ethics is no education in theright sence pf the term.

It is like, ‘you have i your hand a gun,would you test it on other fellow beings?’ Think a little .

Interestingly enough, no natuaral resource depletes, for that is infact ‘inexhaustible’ fact.

E.g.

See you irrigate same soil over and over again for several years, do you find the land fails  

to  provide you food grains and the like even if you rotate crops;

See, you manufacture with machines whether ‘products’  depletes, every season you  

produce the products, as you did before; your ‘raw materials’ continue to flow again and  

Again, provided you are not greedy man – see you say M&A = mergers and acquisitions  

obviously you want to corner the wealth, wealth is one progresses in an arithmatetical  

sence not geometrically ;

So too in any productive activities;  Can you have 100 children to be your clan; If had  

naturally ‘calamities’ like ‘sharing’ emerges, you saw why Dhuryodana wanted to expand  

his kingdom of Kauravas by planning to annex ‘Indraprastha ‘ of Pandavas, that led to  

Mahabharatha war, then;

Today there are several examples:

Why Pakistan wants Jammu & Kashmir?

Why Pakistan promotes Taliban kind terrorists?

Why Pakistan machinated the Uri killing of soldiers sleeping in the military tent unarmed?

Why Bangladesh formed?

Why North Korea expanding its Nuclear Arsenal?

Why Hitler wanted Germans to be the Police force of the world, what havoc he played on  

Jews, in Gas chambers?

Why then Japan Emperor Hiroshoto joined Hitler and Musolini of Italy?

Why Terrorists attacked in France and killed  people in the public place of ‘Entertainment  

Theatre in 2015?

Examples are plenty just think it would just  multiply.

Can you find any ‘adharsh purush’ easily even in Ashrams?

What Asaram Bapu did?(He is a big fraud) (played fraud on the disciples, misused disciples’ by so called ‘disciplines ‘ Asaram Bapu imposed – obviously he misused his ‘fake  knowledge on scriptures.)

And  like ‘him’,  several ashrams are run, all over in India, (in fact, modern so called ‘seers’   

With the above perception if we look to things in Political scenerio in Indo-Pak relations, Gyana in fact is misused, let us see ?

Indians and Pakistanis governments in the last about 70 years of Independence they both believed in ‘War Machines’ to settle issues.

War is no panacea was appreciated since ‘Kalinga war ‘ of Ashokan Mauriyan age ;  wherein Ashoka as the Mauriyan Emperor realised after visiting the battle field  he found about three lac ( ie. 300,000 soldiers felled by the war).

He started visualizing their families and their turmoil after the war, then he mentally saw a very big kingdom of people that they could form into; besides he again visualized  three lac felled soldiers if alive  what kind of people he could have seen; and he worked mentally on , a kind of society he saw, that way his mental map grew into a very big society… and thus he realized ,’what kind of Sin he committed, before the Lord Conscience he  felt. Then , that mental drive on the plane of mind ‘enlightened’ him, – ‘Worst Sinner, if ever one is , he felt, it is nothing other than ‘ very Kings’.

 

He really wanted to  cleanse his polluted mind when he ordered his war machinery to attack ‘Kalingadesh’ (modern Odissa) just to expand his state by the idea of  of sinister  idea of ‘Annexation’.

He realized , ‘very idea of  annexation’ itself the first serious Sin.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

just want . (2nd Part of Upanishad appreciation.) 

What is ‘Gyana -shakthi’ (Knowledge based on Wisdom) and ‘Kriya shakhthi’ (actions based on Wisdom)

 

By  Prof. (Acharya). Dr. Guru Balakrishnan. PhD M.L

 

Gyana (Jnana) -Shakti (Knowledge based Wisdom)  and on ‘Kriya-Shakthi’ (Knowlege based action of Man) (so too of Animals and all amphibians). Every living creature is itself a ‘Creator’himself or herself like very God.

 

How?

 

Gynana shakthi is called (Medha = Wisdom based knowledge);

Kriya shakthi is called a ‘ Tapas ‘ based ;

 

Obviously, ‘Manusha’ = Humans (Men)  includes all Animal world, as Man several times behaves like ‘ignorant person’.

 

Examples:

(just illustrative only and you can add many depending on your own life experieces, that can be some of your own ‘Upanishadic thoughts’, so any one can write from his or her real life experiences can objectively write the thoughts, by just being impartial observers, then in Aranya vasam , living in forests as a single person, once one spouse dies or one takes to ‘sanyasa’ (mostly people choose to walk out of his famiy) l(leaving all properties and all that he held close to his chest) and the one chooses  to live all alone without any assistance  – else spouses will be ‘selfish’(indeed true, you see why you people get things for your grand children and their children, you can realise) is the basic concept )

 

Root cause of all trouble is ‘Desire for wealth or anything in material form. So In Aranya ashram, he just despices all’ material form wealth, is the paradigm propagated by this last ‘dharma’ called ‘Aranyam’.

 

This material wealth problem has caught in every part of the universes. So Stephen Hawkins recently said in his research reveals some more powerful  beings are likely to reach this earth, as we (men) unnecessarily contacting them, that will be [perhaps the end of this ‘human’s civilization, jst because those beings just could vanquish man- humans just in ‘No time’ frame, it is stated in the latest research…yes, ‘we started internet, that would extend their reach on us – Humans, it is believed – what is once acceptable would soon turn into very bad proposition.

 

We have an experience in Nuclear power, of what happened in Hiroshima, Nagasaki in Japan in 1946, or in Chernobyl (Ukraine) (Russia) (USSR), in the 1980s (now it is said it would take about 1000 years to rever the position of very Chernobyl as a township as then on;y some people or kiving beings may/ can survive as is presumed now;

 

In 2004, we experienced ‘Tsunami’ due to underground earthquakes in Aceh (Java)(indonesia). That took a toll about a lac of people in the area covering the Indian ocean, like Sri Lanka,Taiwan, Malasia, some parts of Australia (North zones) , India, and so on…

 

so also in Bhopal Union Carbide ‘Isocynate’ explosion which just killed about 20,000 persons and a lot many disabled in various ways;

 

We saw in Fakushima (Japan) in 2011 or 2012, in Dai- chi thermal power plant explosions, due to flooding the reactors just gave in deadly radiation.

 

Fact is any ‘advancement ‘  materially has a lot of consequences is a great facr, after all any material desire in bound to have its side bad effects too is again and again confirmed by natural events , like Plateu plates in india and other countries relevant to the plateau got affected and seriously suffered, due to Tsunami caused  by earthquake in 2004.

 

Therefore, how well the Upanishads reveal the facts  is no exaggeration. Nature adjusts to new series of effects naturally besides by ‘Man made ‘ disaters one can visualize.

 

Again see, how valid is the Upanshad on Janashakti (Wisdom based knowledge). See below somw illustrative examples:

 

Recently in the State of U P,  at  or near Bhulandshar, some high way rapist  

            cum robbers, attacked a  car and forcibly stopped the car and  robbed and  

            pulled out females from it, and took them to some secluded place and gang  

            Raped the women  – a teacher and her teen aged daughter and left them    

           There and escaped; the attacked  family walked the distance to a near by  

           police station; and lodged their FIR on the irreconcilable event on the high  

           way – obviously due to  non presence  (absence) of High way police in the    

           Zone‘ –  instead of the State taking liability and responsibility and

           accountability to that family as also to India citizens, as also wporld  

           community – its State  Minister one Mr. Azam Khan tries to say ‘ robbing and     

           rape ‘ perpetrated by  the llocal  opposition politicians to ptove the exis ‘so   

           called’ ,   ‘S P (Samaj ( = Society protector) wadi),  party) in power try to bask  

                                     in  its own glory, simply to clean itts very  dirty linen,  used that man in Azam  

                                     Khan to say so, obviously hurting the sentiments of the family which rightly    

                                      asked for the trial in some other state other than  the UP (obviously for want of

                                     ts confidence on the government in power in the U P);

 

Remarks:

 

It is indeed on the part of the State or Azam Khab obviously not a  

wisdom based knowledge (Gyana); but some ‘useless Knowledge)  

that resuted, ‘ blasphemous statements by the Stae under non

wisdom based (Kriya shakti) action of the state concerned; while the  

affected family rughtly used its wisdom based knowledge ( Gyana

shakti) to request the court to transfer the case to the state other than

in the UP fearing ‘ justice is not possible’ to be obtained as trial

courts work under tge very obvious ‘failed’ state and such action falls

under ( ‘Kriya shakthy’ – wisdom based action)

 

One can read here why the rule of law is there saying when

one complainant moves a court not confident to get right justice at the place that person can request the very local trial cpurt or rthe very high court to transfer its case in the interest of ‘Justice’ ( very pribnciple of justice is Justice is done , and the justice seemed to have been done)

  

 

Similarly, ‘Uri’ attack, recently, in Kashmir where ‘ Indian soldiers’ in the tent    

            sleeping,  unarmed were mercilessly shot dead by very Pakistan Soldiers –   

            obviously  such kind of action by any military force is not treated as any  

            glorious Military act (  Yuddha -dharma – gyana shakthi followed time   

            immemorial). ( such ideas are based upon Gyana shakti time immemorial)   

            and any such ‘actions following ‘gyana shakthi’  is called right Kriya shakti   

            Doctrine;

 

Another example:

 

I am given to understand in the state of Mharashtra, ‘Marati teachers’ are being removed as ‘Marati medium is not accepted as the pupils do not take to ‘Marati Medium’, just because ‘pupils parents want ‘ English medium schools, tha means government cannot remove ‘Marati medium teachers’ at all as that Marati medium was basically promoted by the very State, and started such teacher education programs, depending  on the program several persons chose to do as local government wanted vernacular schools to be promooted; it was not the folly of the marati medium teachers, ‘they too to Marati medium courses and then got trainedt  as  some chose to become vernacular teachers,

(but for the teachers how will the local governments can run marati (vernacular) medium schools; so it is obvious the government cannot remove marati medium teachers , but obviously  ought to maintain them even pupils strength falls as pupils choose  English Medium  ( That is Gyana shakthi  with right Kriya Shaki  – meaning Wisdom);(In the alternative provide them full pensionary benefits and thus retire them – you cannot discharge them without benefits , so that there will be some credibility of government is possible.) Obviously , the Marati medium teachers can form an association , and move the Bombay High Court under Art 226 r/w 227 r/w Art 14, Art 51A, Art 300A (property) citing the case L A Chandrakumar vs UOI case, to ensure them some livelihood relevant to their qualifications or retire them with ‘notional’ service benefiits counting their ‘future- Notional service’ as teachers , with the last pay drawn basis their pensions need to be calculated, so that they need not be on roads and need not ‘commit suicides’ as they are likely to due non availability of jobs in private sector , if not need be absorbed as ‘junior clerks with their last drawn salaries protected, in regular government offices where ‘marati ‘ as lingua franca is used; or use them as ‘translators’ into Marati from English or viceversa, by duky training them in the ‘in house training schools’ that is called (gyana shakthi);( Affected teachers can take to court for redress, that way the hon  Courts today use Judicial reviews as a Gyana-shakthy.(If needed the relevant groups of teachers can get my free legal advice, if approached) (ANY WAY I am posting here*  a specimen – Writ Draft (you can use to your relative circumstances, on *Face Book on my Time Line (you can open my account –

 

Same thing happened, in Andhra Pradesh, some decades back at Hyderabad, what then A P Government did.  ‘  A P government (then) retained the ‘Telugu medium teachers’, till their term of service was over, and bestowed on them ‘relevant pensionary benefits’; (Such action by State is to be treated ‘ Governance by a government in place. That is called ‘ Gyana -shakti followed by Kriya -shakthy; – Such ideas were perceived time immemorial).

 

If Humans behave like Sri Ram or Lord Krishna, or Lord Buddha,  Yudhishtra, Vyasa, Vashista, Valmiki, Lord Jesus Moses, Zoraster, Seer Tiruvalluvar , Avvayyar and the like, any Pope (at Rome), Mohammed, Bhakthi Vedanta of ISCON, Shankara, Ramanuja, Annamacharya, Lata Mangeshkar, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Albert Einstein, Newton, Mahatama Gandhi, Dr. Nelson  Mandela, and like, many others whom you call them as ‘Evolved Persons, (Gyanis – Wisdom based knowledge evolved)    (Medha(vis))(men of high order wisdom).

 

When such persons perform their actions called Kriya shakti then it is called Wisdom based actions.

 

If men like  Ravana, Hiranyaksha, Hiranya Kaspu, Duryodhana, later forms in Hitler, Mussolini, Chengez Khan, Osama bin Laden, all kinds of ‘terrorists’ ;and their kind (called as ‘devils; rapists and murderers as smaller devils types) when they perform , they generally perform , ordinary knowledge based actions. They also have ‘some  unendurable knowledge’ and perform persistently their own actions sans Wisdom.

(These kinds  said in 2nd category would  definitely corner everything for them is the critera.)

 

The issue of thought is , you like to have everything in exclusion of others – fellow beings, is the paradigm.

 

Similarly, today’s youth (as ill-educated by selfishness based education) are not inclined to be  duty bound;

 

unlike what  seer Truvakkuvar said types – ‘sons and the like if do things greatly exemplary’ would be treated as real meaningful progeny to speard their family names.

 

World has the second quality or type, in the greatest number possible due to wrong set of thoughts generated in the young age (like pasumarathil adittha aani pol = like a nail is driven in a live green tree),;

 

while the former type (wisdom based children) is in the least number; therefore , creations and destructions speed increases in an accellerated moves, that way they create more  and more ‘pralayas’ ‘destructions, or called (mentally paralysed persons;

like most of the modern politicians who look for their personal benefits forgetting their duty to their voters as also the citizens once elected to office; besides many of public servants do fall in this category, one may clearly decipher, all over the human race  world over.

 

Very concept of ‘Mausha’ quality (tanmai ) has lost its track.  Manusham means ‘justb human’. Do we find such humans in great number? Obviously NO, just because , our lop educated education is thev cause, education sans morality and ethics is no education in theright sence pf the term.

 

It is like, ‘you have i your hand a gun,would you test it on other fellow beings?’ Think a little .

 

Interestingly enough, no natuaral resource depletes, for that is infact ‘inexhaustible’ fact.

 

E.g.

See you irrigate same soil over and over again for several years, do you find the land fails  

to  provide you food grains and the like even if you rotate crops;

 

See, you manufacture with machines whether ‘products’  depletes, every season you  

produce the products, as you did before; your ‘raw materials’ continue to flow again and  

Again, provided you are not greedy man – see you say M&A = mergers and acquisitions  

obviously you want to corner the wealth, wealth is one progresses in an arithmatetical  

sence not geometrically ;

 

So too in any productive activities;  Can you have 100 children to be your clan; If had  

naturally ‘calamities’ like ‘sharing’ emerges, you saw why Dhuryodana wanted to expand  

his kingdom of Kauravas by planning to annex ‘Indraprastha ‘ of Pandavas, that led to  

Mahabharatha war, then;

 

Today there are several examples:

 

Why Pakistan wants Jammu & Kashmir?

Why Pakistan promotes Taliban kind terrorists?

Why Pakistan machinated the Uri killing of soldiers sleeping in the military tent unarmed?

Why Bangladesh formed?

Why North Korea expanding its Nuclear Arsenal?

Why Hitler wanted Germans to be the Police force of the world, what havoc he played on  

Jews, in Gas chambers?

Why then Japan Emperor Hiroshoto joined Hitler and Musolini of Italy?

Why Terrorists attacked in France and killed  people in the public place of ‘Entertainment  

Theatre in 2015?

Examples are plenty just think it would just  multiply.

 

Can you find any ‘adharsh purush’ easily even in Ashrams?

 

What Asaram Bapu did?(He is a big fraud) (played fraud on the disciples, misused disciples’ by so called ‘disciplines ‘ Asaram Bapu imposed – obviously he misused his ‘fake  knowledge on scritures.)

 

And  like ‘him’,  several aashrams are run, all over in India, (in fact, modern so called ‘seers’   

just want . (2nd Part of Upanishad appreciation.) (Ends)